Hon Barbara Scott asks about the cost of remedying Kaleeya Hospital assets after purchase, specifically if it exceeded $2 million and if recovery was undertaken. The answer details estimated repair and replacement costs, confirming the $2M threshold was not exceeded.

AnsweredQoN 3445Legislative Council
Asked
3 May 2006
Portfolio
Health

QuestionView source ↗

(1) What was determined as the aggregate cost of remedying the assets of Kaleeya Hospital within the two months period after purchase as allowed for in the offer to purchase?
(2) If this exceeded $2 million, what was the excess and was it recovered?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
30 May 2006
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Health
Response time
27 days
" The consensus of the reviewing personnel is that - in general- the facilities, equipment and other assets of both the Kaleeya Private Hospital and the Kaleeya Medical Centre are in adequate operational condition and do not preclude proceeding with the purchase" The Report stated the estimated cost of: · building repair and maintenance was $380,000 (these matters were described as " neither unsafe or immediately essential" ); and · replacement of biomedical equipment was $1,600,000. (While flagged as requiring replacement the Report found " the replacement is not necessarily immediate"). (2) The amount did not exceed $2M so no recovery was undertaken.
The Report stated the estimated cost of: · building repair and maintenance was $380,000 (these matters were described as " neither unsafe or immediately essential" ); and · replacement of biomedical equipment was $1,600,000. (While flagged as requiring replacement the Report found " the replacement is not necessarily immediate"). (2) The amount did not exceed $2M so no recovery was undertaken.
· building repair and maintenance was $380,000 (these matters were described as " neither unsafe or immediately essential" ); and · replacement of biomedical equipment was $1,600,000. (While flagged as requiring replacement the Report found " the replacement is not necessarily immediate"). (2) The amount did not exceed $2M so no recovery was undertaken.
· replacement of biomedical equipment was $1,600,000. (While flagged as requiring replacement the Report found " the replacement is not necessarily immediate"). (2) The amount did not exceed $2M so no recovery was undertaken.
(2) The amount did not exceed $2M so no recovery was undertaken.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more