❓ The question challenges the Environment Minister's previous answer to QoN 3753, highlighting inconsistencies and demanding a clear, relevant response. It questions the relevance of cited QoNs and seeks specific textual justifications.
⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 4777Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to question on notice number 3753 of 29 June 2006 and the answer provided which in part states ‘(1-11) Refer to questions on notice …’ followed by approximately 100 question numbers of which question numbers 393, 576, 3544 and 1269 are included -
(1) Can the Minister explain why the answer refers to questions ‘1-11’, when there were only 9 questions asked?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
(3) Can the Minister quote the specific text from the answers to question on notice number 393, and explain how this answer is directly relevant to the question asked in question number 3753?
(4) If no to (3), why not?
(5) Can the Minister quote the specific text from the answers to question on notice number 576, and explain how this answer is directly relevant to the question asked in question number 3753?
(6) If no to (5), why not?
(7) Can the Minister quote the specific text from the answers to question on notice number 3544, and explain how this answer is directly relevant to the question asked in question number 3753?
(8) If no to (7), why not?
(9) Can the Minister quote the specific text from the answers to question on notice number 1269, and explain how this answer is directly relevant to the question asked in question number 3753?
(10) If no to (9), why not?
(11) Would the Minister please now supply an answer to question 3753 that is clear, concise, relevant and free from argument?
(12) If no to (11), why not?
Answered on
(1) Can the Minister explain why the answer refers to questions ‘1-11’, when there were only 9 questions asked?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
(3) Can the Minister quote the specific text from the answers to question on notice number 393, and explain how this answer is directly relevant to the question asked in question number 3753?
(4) If no to (3), why not?
(5) Can the Minister quote the specific text from the answers to question on notice number 576, and explain how this answer is directly relevant to the question asked in question number 3753?
(6) If no to (5), why not?
(7) Can the Minister quote the specific text from the answers to question on notice number 3544, and explain how this answer is directly relevant to the question asked in question number 3753?
(8) If no to (7), why not?
(9) Can the Minister quote the specific text from the answers to question on notice number 1269, and explain how this answer is directly relevant to the question asked in question number 3753?
(10) If no to (9), why not?
(11) Would the Minister please now supply an answer to question 3753 that is clear, concise, relevant and free from argument?
(12) If no to (11), why not?
Answered on
AnswerView source ↗
⏳
This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.