❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks detailed data on training place applications, offers, and acceptances across various TAFE institutions for Semester Two, 2010, including comparisons to Semester One applications. The answer provides specific figures for each institution.
AnsweredQoN 2905Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) How many applications for training places were received for courses commencing in semester two, at each of the following, -
(a) Central Institute of Technology;
(b) Challenger Institute of Technology;
(c) Polytechnic West;
(d) West Coast Institute of Training;
(e) Durack Institute of Technology;
(f) CY O’Connor College of TAFE;
(g) Great Southern Institute of Technology;
(h) Kimberley TAFE;
(i) Pilbara TAFE; and
(j) South West Regional College of TAFE?
(2) For the applications received for semester two, for each of the State Training Providers listed above, -
(a) how many received first round offers to study in semester two, and how many consequently took up those offers;
(b) how many did not receive first round offers to study in semester two;
(c) how many were referred to other State Training Providers and consequently received an offer and of those, how many consequently took up those offers;
(d) how many received offers of alternative State Training Provider courses, not including bridging and entry courses, and how many consequently took up those offers;
(e) how many received offers of bridging or entry courses at a State Training Provider and how many consequently took up those offers;
(f) how many, at the conclusion of the admissions process, remained unplaced and of those, how many were referred to other Registered Training Organisations; and
(g) how many of these applicants for semester two places had previously and unsuccessfully applied for places for a place for Semester One of 2010?
(a) Central Institute of Technology;
(b) Challenger Institute of Technology;
(c) Polytechnic West;
(d) West Coast Institute of Training;
(e) Durack Institute of Technology;
(f) CY O’Connor College of TAFE;
(g) Great Southern Institute of Technology;
(h) Kimberley TAFE;
(i) Pilbara TAFE; and
(j) South West Regional College of TAFE?
(2) For the applications received for semester two, for each of the State Training Providers listed above, -
(a) how many received first round offers to study in semester two, and how many consequently took up those offers;
(b) how many did not receive first round offers to study in semester two;
(c) how many were referred to other State Training Providers and consequently received an offer and of those, how many consequently took up those offers;
(d) how many received offers of alternative State Training Provider courses, not including bridging and entry courses, and how many consequently took up those offers;
(e) how many received offers of bridging or entry courses at a State Training Provider and how many consequently took up those offers;
(f) how many, at the conclusion of the admissions process, remained unplaced and of those, how many were referred to other Registered Training Organisations; and
(g) how many of these applicants for semester two places had previously and unsuccessfully applied for places for a place for Semester One of 2010?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
24 November 2010
Responded by
Minister for Training and Workforce Development
Response time
35 days
(1) (a) 2,521
(b) 1,220
(c) 2,278
(d) 1,084
(e) 61
(f) 5
(g 84
(h) 4
(i) 1
(j) 455
(2) Offers Accepted Offer Non Offer
(a) 2,151 1,750 370
(b) 960 756 260
(c) 1,946 1,513 332
(d) 1,033 867 51
(e) 50 45 11
(f) 5 5
(g) 74 63 10
(h) 2 2 2
(i) 1 1
(j) 404 336 51
(d) 261 offers were made by the admissions centre, of which 176 were accepted.
(e) Offers for such courses are not made; students enrol directly at the institute of their choice.
(f) 86% of applicants received offers from the admissions centre. At the conclusion of the process the remaining 14% had been followed up by the institute selected as their first preference for alternative study options. Applicants were not referred to other Registered Training Organisations.
(g) 19
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(b) 1,220
(c) 2,278
(d) 1,084
(e) 61
(f) 5
(g 84
(h) 4
(i) 1
(j) 455
(2) Offers Accepted Offer Non Offer
(a) 2,151 1,750 370
(b) 960 756 260
(c) 1,946 1,513 332
(d) 1,033 867 51
(e) 50 45 11
(f) 5 5
(g) 74 63 10
(h) 2 2 2
(i) 1 1
(j) 404 336 51
(d) 261 offers were made by the admissions centre, of which 176 were accepted.
(e) Offers for such courses are not made; students enrol directly at the institute of their choice.
(f) 86% of applicants received offers from the admissions centre. At the conclusion of the process the remaining 14% had been followed up by the institute selected as their first preference for alternative study options. Applicants were not referred to other Registered Training Organisations.
(g) 19
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.