❓ Dr. Constable asks about the operating costs and funding sources for various emergency services and programs managed by FESA in WA for the 2002/2003 and projected costs for 2003/2004. The answer provides a breakdown of budget allocations, funding sources, and operating costs, noting that some figures are notional and based on allocation models.
AnsweredQoN 2881Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(ii) Bush fire brigades; (iii) State Emergency Services; and (iv) Multi-service FESA units;
(iii) State Emergency Services; and (iv) Multi-service FESA units;
(iv) Multi-service FESA units;
(c) what were the operating costs for each of the following services for the 2002/2003 financial year - (i) Volunteer fire and rescue service; (ii) Bush fire brigades; (iii) State Emergency Services; and (iv) Multi-service FESA units; (d) what was the cost of operating the following FESA programs for the 2002/2003 financial year - (i) Training of volunteers; (ii) Community safety programs; (iii) Emergency management planning; (iv) Emergency Management services; and (v) Corporate support; and (e) what are the projected costs for the programs mentioned in (d) for the 2003/2004 financial year?
(ii) Bush fire brigades; (iii) State Emergency Services; and (iv) Multi-service FESA units;
(iii) State Emergency Services; and (iv) Multi-service FESA units;
(iv) Multi-service FESA units;
(ii) Community safety programs; (iii) Emergency management planning; (iv) Emergency Management services; and (v) Corporate support; and
(iii) Emergency management planning; (iv) Emergency Management services; and (v) Corporate support; and
(iv) Emergency Management services; and (v) Corporate support; and
(v) Corporate support; and
(i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service $8,492,000 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades $10,669,000 (iii) State Emergency Service $5,598,000 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units $Nil Note insurance companies only contributed to the Career Fire Service. The above are volunteer services. (b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source. % % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(ii) Bush Fire Brigades $10,669,000 (iii) State Emergency Service $5,598,000 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units $Nil Note insurance companies only contributed to the Career Fire Service. The above are volunteer services. (b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source. % % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(iii) State Emergency Service $5,598,000 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units $Nil Note insurance companies only contributed to the Career Fire Service. The above are volunteer services. (b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source. % % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(iv) Multi-service FESA Units $Nil Note insurance companies only contributed to the Career Fire Service. The above are volunteer services. (b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source. % % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
Note insurance companies only contributed to the Career Fire Service. The above are volunteer services. (b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source. % % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source. % % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
% % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
$?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
$?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
$?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(iii) State Emergency Services; and (iv) Multi-service FESA units;
(iv) Multi-service FESA units;
(c) what were the operating costs for each of the following services for the 2002/2003 financial year - (i) Volunteer fire and rescue service; (ii) Bush fire brigades; (iii) State Emergency Services; and (iv) Multi-service FESA units; (d) what was the cost of operating the following FESA programs for the 2002/2003 financial year - (i) Training of volunteers; (ii) Community safety programs; (iii) Emergency management planning; (iv) Emergency Management services; and (v) Corporate support; and (e) what are the projected costs for the programs mentioned in (d) for the 2003/2004 financial year?
(ii) Bush fire brigades; (iii) State Emergency Services; and (iv) Multi-service FESA units;
(iii) State Emergency Services; and (iv) Multi-service FESA units;
(iv) Multi-service FESA units;
(ii) Community safety programs; (iii) Emergency management planning; (iv) Emergency Management services; and (v) Corporate support; and
(iii) Emergency management planning; (iv) Emergency Management services; and (v) Corporate support; and
(iv) Emergency Management services; and (v) Corporate support; and
(v) Corporate support; and
(i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service $8,492,000 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades $10,669,000 (iii) State Emergency Service $5,598,000 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units $Nil Note insurance companies only contributed to the Career Fire Service. The above are volunteer services. (b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source. % % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(ii) Bush Fire Brigades $10,669,000 (iii) State Emergency Service $5,598,000 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units $Nil Note insurance companies only contributed to the Career Fire Service. The above are volunteer services. (b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source. % % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(iii) State Emergency Service $5,598,000 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units $Nil Note insurance companies only contributed to the Career Fire Service. The above are volunteer services. (b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source. % % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(iv) Multi-service FESA Units $Nil Note insurance companies only contributed to the Career Fire Service. The above are volunteer services. (b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source. % % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
Note insurance companies only contributed to the Career Fire Service. The above are volunteer services. (b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source. % % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source. % % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
% % % Insurance Local Gov?t State Gov?t (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Nil Nil 100 (ii) Bush Fire Brigades Nil Nil 100 (iii) State Emergency Service Nil Nil 100 (iv) Multi-service FESA Units Nil Nil Nil Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts. (c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(c) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
$?000 (i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service 8,490 (ii) Bush fire brigades 10,704 (iii) State Emergency Services 5,353 (iv) Multi-service FESA units 93 (d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(d) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
$?000 (i) Training of volunteers 5,584 (ii) Community safety programs 9,721 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 720 (v) Corporate support 24,070 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services. (e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(e) FESA advise as follows: $?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
$?000 (i) Training of volunteers 7,824 (ii) Community safety programs 10,243 (iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning and Emergency Management Services 750 (v) Corporate support 30,492 The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level. Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades. The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
25 August 2004
Responded by
Minister for Police and Emergency Services
Response time
85 days
(a) The Fire and Emergency Services Authority (FESA) advise the allocations in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 were:
(i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service $8,492,000
(ii) Bush Fire Brigades $10,669,000
(iii) State Emergency Service $5,598,000
(iv) Multi-service FESA Units $Nil
Note insurance companies only contributed to the Career Fire Service. The above are volunteer services.
(b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source.
%
%
%
Insurance
Local Gov?t
State Gov?t
(i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service
Nil
Nil
100
(ii) Bush Fire Brigades
Nil
Nil
100
(iii) State Emergency Service
Nil
Nil
100
(iv) Multi-service FESA Units
Nil
Nil
Nil
Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts.
(c) FESA advise as follows:
$?000
(i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service
8,490
(ii) Bush fire brigades
10,704
(iii) State Emergency Services
5,353
(iv) Multi-service FESA units
93
(d) FESA advise as follows:
$?000
(i) Training of volunteers
5,584
(ii) Community safety programs
9,721
(iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning
and Emergency Management Services
720
(v) Corporate support
24,070
The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level.
The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(e) FESA advise as follows:
$?000
(i) Training of volunteers
7,824
(ii) Community safety programs
10,243
(iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning
and Emergency Management Services
750
(v) Corporate support
30,492
The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level.
Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades.
The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service $8,492,000
(ii) Bush Fire Brigades $10,669,000
(iii) State Emergency Service $5,598,000
(iv) Multi-service FESA Units $Nil
Note insurance companies only contributed to the Career Fire Service. The above are volunteer services.
(b) The following are the amounts in the FESA budget for 2002/2003 and their source.
%
%
%
Insurance
Local Gov?t
State Gov?t
(i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service
Nil
Nil
100
(ii) Bush Fire Brigades
Nil
Nil
100
(iii) State Emergency Service
Nil
Nil
100
(iv) Multi-service FESA Units
Nil
Nil
Nil
Prior to the introduction of the Emergency Services Levy (ESL), Local Government contributed directly to the Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority does not have access to detail about these amounts.
(c) FESA advise as follows:
$?000
(i) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service
8,490
(ii) Bush fire brigades
10,704
(iii) State Emergency Services
5,353
(iv) Multi-service FESA units
93
(d) FESA advise as follows:
$?000
(i) Training of volunteers
5,584
(ii) Community safety programs
9,721
(iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning
and Emergency Management Services
720
(v) Corporate support
24,070
The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level.
The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
(e) FESA advise as follows:
$?000
(i) Training of volunteers
7,824
(ii) Community safety programs
10,243
(iii) & (iv) Emergency management planning
and Emergency Management Services
750
(v) Corporate support
30,492
The above are notional amounts based on an allocation model. FESA does not capture these costs at this level.
Through the ESL in 2003/2004, $8 million in operational grants was provided to Local Government for their Bush Fire Brigades and State Emergency Service units. A large portion of these funds would be used for volunteer training as determined by Local Government and its volunteer brigades.
The Corporate support is an overhead cost and not a FESA program. These costs support all FESA delivered services.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.