❓ Hon Phil Edman asks about the rollout, funding, and cost discrepancies of the State Underground Power Program. The Minister provides a detailed response, tabling it in Hansard, addressing concerns about costs, pensioner assistance, and local government responsibilities.
AnsweredQoN 973Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
UNDERGROUND POWER — METROPOLITAN PROGRAM
(1) Can the minister provide an update of the rollout of underground power across the metropolitan region? (2) Can the minister outline the contributions that the government has provided to this program and the benefits that it has brought to the communities involved in the program? (3) Can the minister outline the reasons why householders in different areas are being charged different amounts? (4) How are charges calculated when several units are located on the same block that requires only one connection? (5) Have any complaints been received about the differences in the amounts home owners are being charged from one area to another; and (a) if so, were those complaints investigated; and, if they were investigated, what was the outcome of those investigations? (6) What happens when people such as pensioners are unable to pay the connection fee? Hon PETER COLLIER
(1) Can the minister provide an update of the rollout of underground power across the metropolitan region? (2) Can the minister outline the contributions that the government has provided to this program and the benefits that it has brought to the communities involved in the program? (3) Can the minister outline the reasons why householders in different areas are being charged different amounts? (4) How are charges calculated when several units are located on the same block that requires only one connection? (5) Have any complaints been received about the differences in the amounts home owners are being charged from one area to another; and (a) if so, were those complaints investigated; and, if they were investigated, what was the outcome of those investigations? (6) What happens when people such as pensioners are unable to pay the connection fee? Hon PETER COLLIER
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
(2) Can the minister outline the contributions that the government has provided to this program and the benefits that it has brought to the communities involved in the program? (3) Can the minister outline the reasons why householders in different areas are being charged different amounts? (4) How are charges calculated when several units are located on the same block that requires only one connection? (5) Have any complaints been received about the differences in the amounts home owners are being charged from one area to another; and (a) if so, were those complaints investigated; and, if they were investigated, what was the outcome of those investigations? (6) What happens when people such as pensioners are unable to pay the connection fee? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
(3) Can the minister outline the reasons why householders in different areas are being charged different amounts? (4) How are charges calculated when several units are located on the same block that requires only one connection? (5) Have any complaints been received about the differences in the amounts home owners are being charged from one area to another; and (a) if so, were those complaints investigated; and, if they were investigated, what was the outcome of those investigations? (6) What happens when people such as pensioners are unable to pay the connection fee? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
(4) How are charges calculated when several units are located on the same block that requires only one connection? (5) Have any complaints been received about the differences in the amounts home owners are being charged from one area to another; and (a) if so, were those complaints investigated; and, if they were investigated, what was the outcome of those investigations? (6) What happens when people such as pensioners are unable to pay the connection fee? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
(5) Have any complaints been received about the differences in the amounts home owners are being charged from one area to another; and (a) if so, were those complaints investigated; and, if they were investigated, what was the outcome of those investigations? (6) What happens when people such as pensioners are unable to pay the connection fee? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
[See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
(2) Can the minister outline the contributions that the government has provided to this program and the benefits that it has brought to the communities involved in the program? (3) Can the minister outline the reasons why householders in different areas are being charged different amounts? (4) How are charges calculated when several units are located on the same block that requires only one connection? (5) Have any complaints been received about the differences in the amounts home owners are being charged from one area to another; and (a) if so, were those complaints investigated; and, if they were investigated, what was the outcome of those investigations? (6) What happens when people such as pensioners are unable to pay the connection fee? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
(3) Can the minister outline the reasons why householders in different areas are being charged different amounts? (4) How are charges calculated when several units are located on the same block that requires only one connection? (5) Have any complaints been received about the differences in the amounts home owners are being charged from one area to another; and (a) if so, were those complaints investigated; and, if they were investigated, what was the outcome of those investigations? (6) What happens when people such as pensioners are unable to pay the connection fee? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
(4) How are charges calculated when several units are located on the same block that requires only one connection? (5) Have any complaints been received about the differences in the amounts home owners are being charged from one area to another; and (a) if so, were those complaints investigated; and, if they were investigated, what was the outcome of those investigations? (6) What happens when people such as pensioners are unable to pay the connection fee? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
(5) Have any complaints been received about the differences in the amounts home owners are being charged from one area to another; and (a) if so, were those complaints investigated; and, if they were investigated, what was the outcome of those investigations? (6) What happens when people such as pensioners are unable to pay the connection fee? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. I have a very lengthy response and so I table the response and seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
Leave granted. [See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
[See paper 1405.] The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
The following material was incorporated — __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
1) The State Underground Power Program is continuing under Round Four. Currently about 49 per cent of Perth homes have underground power. The Government has provided a budget allocation for Round five of the Program. Applications are expected to be called for local government submissions to Round five within a month. I am advised that the target of undergrounding the power supply to 50 per cent of homes in the metropolitan area will be reached by the end of 2010. 2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
2) The Government through Western Power and the Office of Energy funds 50 per cent of the cost of undergrounding under the State Underground Power Program. To date this contribution is about $130 million. Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
Efficient retrospective installation of underground power contributes to enhanced streetscapes and visual amenity of public places, improved property values, improved safety, improved system reliability and cost savings in terms of maintenance. 3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
3) Local governments are responsible for funding 50 per cent of the costs of any underground power project for which they have successfully applied under the State Underground Power Program. Generally they pay for this cost by charging ratepayers who benefit from the undergrounding. I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
I am advised that they generally use special area rates or a service charge or a mixture of both. For example, local governments generally charge for the costs of the individual household connection by way of a service charge. I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
I am advised that local governments may charge different premises differing amounts as they may have differing gross rental values or differing power requirements. The actual cost of undergrounding power also varies in different areas due to soil conditions and lot frontages. Some areas may also qualify for additional subsidy based on their socio-economic ratings. 4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
4) How costs are allocated to individual ratepayers is an issue for the local government. I am advised that the cost to residents of group housing developments or to commercial units is not related to the number of connections but rather the electricity usage per customer. While in some cases only one connection is required for a number of units, each unit will use nearly as much electricity as a free-standing building, and therefore they are charged accordingly. 5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
5) Some complaints have been received. a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
a. Complainants are usually advised that local government charges for underground power are strictly a local government matter. Complainants are urged to contact their local government to explore options over payment. Local governments are not required to report on the outcomes of complaints. 6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
6) The payment of local government charges are an issue for local government. The guidelines for the State Underground Power Program recommend that local governments offer pensioners rebates under the State Government Rate Rebate Scheme. Under this scheme pensioners are given a 50 per cent rebate on special area rates for underground power and/or may defer the charge. Nothing prevents a local government from making special arrangements to suit their ratepayers’ particular circumstances. It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
It needs to be noted that the State Underground Power Program is a voluntary scheme to which local governments make application. No underground power project under the State Underground Power Program proceeds unless a survey of ratepayers supports the project and the local government financially commits to the project and its costs. Local Governments are provided with final budgeted costs prior to the conduct of survey so that they may advise their ratepayers of the actual individual costs.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.