❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks information on lobbying activities by CPR Communications on behalf of Anaconda regarding the Officer Basin project. The Minister provides limited information, citing resource constraints for a comprehensive response.
AnsweredQoN 699Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Have you, or any of your Departments or Agencies been lobbied by CPR Communications and Public Relations Pty Ltd?
(2) If so -
(a) in each case, on whose behalf was the lobbying conducted and what were the issue/s or the subject of the approach; and
(b) what was the outcome of each approach?
(2) If so -
(a) in each case, on whose behalf was the lobbying conducted and what were the issue/s or the subject of the approach; and
(b) what was the outcome of each approach?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
19 June 2002
Responded by
Minister for Racing and Gaming
Response time
28 days
(b) what was the outcome of each approach?
(2) (a) On behalf of Anaconda. The issue was "the Officer Basin project". (b) I was advised of Anaconda's views on the issue. But with respect to Departments or Agencies for which I have responsibility the resources required to answer such a general and ill-defined question would involve an unjustified expense. If the member has a specific question relating to a particular meeting, an answer can be provided.
(b) I was advised of Anaconda's views on the issue. But with respect to Departments or Agencies for which I have responsibility the resources required to answer such a general and ill-defined question would involve an unjustified expense. If the member has a specific question relating to a particular meeting, an answer can be provided.
But with respect to Departments or Agencies for which I have responsibility the resources required to answer such a general and ill-defined question would involve an unjustified expense. If the member has a specific question relating to a particular meeting, an answer can be provided.
(2) (a) On behalf of Anaconda. The issue was "the Officer Basin project". (b) I was advised of Anaconda's views on the issue. But with respect to Departments or Agencies for which I have responsibility the resources required to answer such a general and ill-defined question would involve an unjustified expense. If the member has a specific question relating to a particular meeting, an answer can be provided.
(b) I was advised of Anaconda's views on the issue. But with respect to Departments or Agencies for which I have responsibility the resources required to answer such a general and ill-defined question would involve an unjustified expense. If the member has a specific question relating to a particular meeting, an answer can be provided.
But with respect to Departments or Agencies for which I have responsibility the resources required to answer such a general and ill-defined question would involve an unjustified expense. If the member has a specific question relating to a particular meeting, an answer can be provided.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.