❓ Question regarding the listing of South Fremantle Power Station on the State Register of Heritage Places, focusing on the process, instigation, and potential influence from unsolicited bidders. The Minister denies any discussions with unsolicited bidders and defends the Heritage Council's independent process.
AnsweredQoN 301Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
SOUTH FREMANTLE POWER STATION — REGISTER OF
HERITAGE PLACES
301. Mr R.S. LOVE to the Minister for Heritage:
I refer to the minister's
announcement on 14 June that the South Fremantle power station has been added
to the state Register of Heritage Places.
(1) Who sought that listing?
(2) When did
the Heritage Council of Western Australia commence consideration of this final
listing and when was the minister made aware of it?
(3) Has the
minister been in any discussions regarding this listing with the unsolicited
bidder mentioned by the Minister for Energy today?
HERITAGE PLACES
301. Mr R.S. LOVE to the Minister for Heritage:
I refer to the minister's
announcement on 14 June that the South Fremantle power station has been added
to the state Register of Heritage Places.
(1) Who sought that listing?
(2) When did
the Heritage Council of Western Australia commence consideration of this final
listing and when was the minister made aware of it?
(3) Has the
minister been in any discussions regarding this listing with the unsolicited
bidder mentioned by the Minister for Energy today?
AnswerView source ↗
(1)–(3) The
answer to the last question is no. The Heritage Council had a number of
interim-listed sites, with some of them dating back to over 20 years ago. Under
the new Heritage Act, which this government introduced and which reformed a Heritage
Act that a former Labor government introduced, a series of heritage assets that
—
Dr A.D. Buti : Did they put
the Liberal Party on the list?
Mr D.A. TEMPLEMAN : There have
to be criteria including relevance for heritage items and I am not sure whether
the Liberal Party fits that criterion!
A series of assets would have
actually come off the interim list and potentially not been protected, so the
Heritage Council, as is appropriate, held an independent process that finalised
the assessment of a range of heritage assets, including
Victoria Quay, Fremantle port and a number of other sites, including those on
Wadjemup (Rottnest Island ). That is a
normal process of the Heritage Council and, indeed, it is a process that I support.
I was very happy to support the acquisition of those assets on the state
register.
The member's conspiracy
theories that he might have are very puzzling, and one needs to be reminded
that, as we have seen with a number of heritage assets, the application of
heritage value, be it on a municipal list or on the state register, is not an
imposition to the protection and the enhancement of such an asset. We have seen
this along St Georges Terrace with the
former Treasury buildings, as one example, but there are a number. Adaptive
re-use is now a very important principle in protecting heritage assets. I am
looking forward to the interest, and it seems that there is deep interest,
which is great, that may have been expressed because a high-value heritage
outcome will be delivered, as well as an adaptive re-use proposal for the
future of that very important state-registered heritage asset.
answer to the last question is no. The Heritage Council had a number of
interim-listed sites, with some of them dating back to over 20 years ago. Under
the new Heritage Act, which this government introduced and which reformed a Heritage
Act that a former Labor government introduced, a series of heritage assets that
—
Dr A.D. Buti : Did they put
the Liberal Party on the list?
Mr D.A. TEMPLEMAN : There have
to be criteria including relevance for heritage items and I am not sure whether
the Liberal Party fits that criterion!
A series of assets would have
actually come off the interim list and potentially not been protected, so the
Heritage Council, as is appropriate, held an independent process that finalised
the assessment of a range of heritage assets, including
Victoria Quay, Fremantle port and a number of other sites, including those on
Wadjemup (Rottnest Island ). That is a
normal process of the Heritage Council and, indeed, it is a process that I support.
I was very happy to support the acquisition of those assets on the state
register.
The member's conspiracy
theories that he might have are very puzzling, and one needs to be reminded
that, as we have seen with a number of heritage assets, the application of
heritage value, be it on a municipal list or on the state register, is not an
imposition to the protection and the enhancement of such an asset. We have seen
this along St Georges Terrace with the
former Treasury buildings, as one example, but there are a number. Adaptive
re-use is now a very important principle in protecting heritage assets. I am
looking forward to the interest, and it seems that there is deep interest,
which is great, that may have been expressed because a high-value heritage
outcome will be delivered, as well as an adaptive re-use proposal for the
future of that very important state-registered heritage asset.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.