Question regarding the financial implications for the State if it approves a deferral of lifecycle services for the New Perth Stadium project, specifically whether the State will receive a rebate or discount. The answer clarifies that the risk and benefit rests with Project Co, with no cost impact on the State.

AnsweredQoN 5728Legislative Assembly
Asked
16 August 2016
Portfolio
Sport and Recreation

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to Clause 27 - Deferral of Lifecycle Services of "The New Perth Stadium DBFM Project Design, Build Finance and Maintain (DBFM) Project Agreement", tabled by the Treasurer on 28 June 2016, and ask: (a) if the State provides an approval in accordance with Clause 27 (b) of the Agreement, will Project Co: (i) be obliged to provide a rebate to the State; or; (ii) be obliged to discount the State's financial obligations; or; and (iii) will financial settlement be a matter for negotiations between Project Co and the State?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
19 September 2016
Responded by
Minister for Sport and Recreation
Response time
34 days
(a)(i)-(iii)   No; this mechanism operates such that the risk and converse benefit rests with Project Co, with no cost impact on the State.
If the Perth Stadium and Sports Precinct require lifecycle maintenance services prior to the dates set out in the Estate Services Plan, then Project Co must fund these services without an increase in payments from the State. Should the State provide approval in accordance with Clause 27(b), Project Co must continue to ensure that the Perth Stadium and Sports Precinct is fit for purpose or monthly service payments will be abated. At the expiry date, Project Co must also ensure the Perth Stadium and Sports Precinct satisfies a suite of handover conditions and carry out any refurbishment works required to meet these handover conditions without any additional payments from the State.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more