Hon Ken Travers requested data on parking infringements, payments, appeals, and reasons for withdrawal at various train station car parks. The PTA provided data for parts 1 and 2 but declined to provide specific reasons for withdrawn fines due to resource constraints.

AnsweredQoN 2963Legislative Council
Asked
21 April 2015
Portfolio
Transport

QuestionView source ↗

(1) For each month from January 2015, how many parking infringements have been issued at each of the following train station car parks: (a) Claisebrook; (b) East Perth; (c) Mt Lawley; (d) Maylands; (e) Meltham; (f) Bayswater; (g) Ashfield; (h) Bassendean; (i) Success Hill; (j) Guildford; (k) East Guildford; (l) Woodbridge; and (m) Midland? (2) For each station in (1), how many fines were: (a) withdrawn; (b) paid; (c) outstanding; and (d) appealed? (3) For each withdrawn fine in (2)(a), what was the reason?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
19 May 2015
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Transport
Response time
28 days
(1)(a)-(2)(d) [see tabled paper no. ]
(3) The Public Transport Authority (PTA) does not record in any database reasons why an infringement notice is withdrawn and therefore to provide exact figures would require individual investigation of every parking ticket withdrawn for the period in question.
Undertaking such a significant task is considered to be an unreasonable use of public resources.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more