❓ The question seeks clarification on whether a previous answer regarding apprentice employment numbers referred to a contractual obligation or actual employment figures. The response redirects to another question.
AnsweredQoN 4165Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the Minister's answer to Question on Notice 3882, and I ask: (a) noting that the answer stated "eight apprentices were required to be employed by the contractor", can the Minister clarify whether this statement refers to the requirements imposed on the contractor or a confirmation that the contractor has in fact employed that number of apprentices; and (b) what is the actual number of apprentices employed by the contractor for this project?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
12 August 2015
Responded by
Minister for Training and Workforce Development
Response time
49 days
(a)-(b) Refer to Legislative Assembly question on notice no. 4143.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.