❓ Mr. Buswell questions the budget and site specifics for Cape Naturaliste College, including land purchase, services, and tender details. The Minister provides detailed responses regarding site selection, tender status, service provision, and budget allocations for specific infrastructure.
AnsweredQoN 904Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(1) What is the current budget allocation for the Cape Naturaliste College?
(2) With reference to Question on Notice No. 767, can the Minister please advise -
(a) what is the site size and location;
(b) what selection criteria did the Department of Education and Training use to determine the Cape Naturaliste College site;
(c) have tenders been called for the College’s construction;
(d) if yes to (c), what site access date was given to the tenderers; and
(e) will the developer provide the following services -
(i) water;
(ii) electricity;
(iii) gas; and
(iv) sewerage?
(3) Are these costs included in the $4.6 million purchase price of the land?
(4) If no to (3) -
(a) are the costs included in the current budget allocation; and
(b) what amount has been budgeted for each of the above services?
(5) Does the current budget figure include the $4.6 million land acquisition?
(2) With reference to Question on Notice No. 767, can the Minister please advise -
(a) what is the site size and location;
(b) what selection criteria did the Department of Education and Training use to determine the Cape Naturaliste College site;
(c) have tenders been called for the College’s construction;
(d) if yes to (c), what site access date was given to the tenderers; and
(e) will the developer provide the following services -
(i) water;
(ii) electricity;
(iii) gas; and
(iv) sewerage?
(3) Are these costs included in the $4.6 million purchase price of the land?
(4) If no to (3) -
(a) are the costs included in the current budget allocation; and
(b) what amount has been budgeted for each of the above services?
(5) Does the current budget figure include the $4.6 million land acquisition?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
11 May 2006
Responded by
Minister representing the Minister for Education and Training
Response time
28 days
(b) what selection criteria did the Department of Education and Training use to determine the Cape Naturaliste College site; (c) have tenders been called for the College’s construction; (d) if yes to (c), what site access date was given to the tenderers; and (e) will the developer provide the following services - (i) water; (ii) electricity; (iii) gas; and (iv) sewerage?
(c) have tenders been called for the College’s construction; (d) if yes to (c), what site access date was given to the tenderers; and (e) will the developer provide the following services - (i) water; (ii) electricity; (iii) gas; and (iv) sewerage?
(d) if yes to (c), what site access date was given to the tenderers; and (e) will the developer provide the following services - (i) water; (ii) electricity; (iii) gas; and (iv) sewerage?
(e) will the developer provide the following services - (i) water; (ii) electricity; (iii) gas; and (iv) sewerage?
(ii) electricity; (iii) gas; and (iv) sewerage?
(iii) gas; and (iv) sewerage?
(iv) sewerage?
(b) what amount has been budgeted for each of the above services?
2. (a) The site which is located in Yallingup Siding Road, Vasse is 8.002 hectares in area. (b) The criteria included proximity to existing roads and services; distance from the future bypass road; abutting Public Open Space; and central to catchment area. (c) Yes. (d) Vendor has granted unfettered access to the site for construction, pending issue of Certificate of Title. (e) Yes. The developer has undertaken to provide these services up to the school site boundary. There has been confirmation by developer that they will provide tanking service to site, if the sewer is not operational. (3) No (4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(b) The criteria included proximity to existing roads and services; distance from the future bypass road; abutting Public Open Space; and central to catchment area. (c) Yes. (d) Vendor has granted unfettered access to the site for construction, pending issue of Certificate of Title. (e) Yes. The developer has undertaken to provide these services up to the school site boundary. There has been confirmation by developer that they will provide tanking service to site, if the sewer is not operational. (3) No (4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(c) Yes. (d) Vendor has granted unfettered access to the site for construction, pending issue of Certificate of Title. (e) Yes. The developer has undertaken to provide these services up to the school site boundary. There has been confirmation by developer that they will provide tanking service to site, if the sewer is not operational. (3) No (4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(d) Vendor has granted unfettered access to the site for construction, pending issue of Certificate of Title. (e) Yes. The developer has undertaken to provide these services up to the school site boundary. There has been confirmation by developer that they will provide tanking service to site, if the sewer is not operational. (3) No (4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(e) Yes. The developer has undertaken to provide these services up to the school site boundary. There has been confirmation by developer that they will provide tanking service to site, if the sewer is not operational. (3) No (4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(3) No (4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(5) No
(c) have tenders been called for the College’s construction; (d) if yes to (c), what site access date was given to the tenderers; and (e) will the developer provide the following services - (i) water; (ii) electricity; (iii) gas; and (iv) sewerage?
(d) if yes to (c), what site access date was given to the tenderers; and (e) will the developer provide the following services - (i) water; (ii) electricity; (iii) gas; and (iv) sewerage?
(e) will the developer provide the following services - (i) water; (ii) electricity; (iii) gas; and (iv) sewerage?
(ii) electricity; (iii) gas; and (iv) sewerage?
(iii) gas; and (iv) sewerage?
(iv) sewerage?
(b) what amount has been budgeted for each of the above services?
2. (a) The site which is located in Yallingup Siding Road, Vasse is 8.002 hectares in area. (b) The criteria included proximity to existing roads and services; distance from the future bypass road; abutting Public Open Space; and central to catchment area. (c) Yes. (d) Vendor has granted unfettered access to the site for construction, pending issue of Certificate of Title. (e) Yes. The developer has undertaken to provide these services up to the school site boundary. There has been confirmation by developer that they will provide tanking service to site, if the sewer is not operational. (3) No (4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(b) The criteria included proximity to existing roads and services; distance from the future bypass road; abutting Public Open Space; and central to catchment area. (c) Yes. (d) Vendor has granted unfettered access to the site for construction, pending issue of Certificate of Title. (e) Yes. The developer has undertaken to provide these services up to the school site boundary. There has been confirmation by developer that they will provide tanking service to site, if the sewer is not operational. (3) No (4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(c) Yes. (d) Vendor has granted unfettered access to the site for construction, pending issue of Certificate of Title. (e) Yes. The developer has undertaken to provide these services up to the school site boundary. There has been confirmation by developer that they will provide tanking service to site, if the sewer is not operational. (3) No (4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(d) Vendor has granted unfettered access to the site for construction, pending issue of Certificate of Title. (e) Yes. The developer has undertaken to provide these services up to the school site boundary. There has been confirmation by developer that they will provide tanking service to site, if the sewer is not operational. (3) No (4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(e) Yes. The developer has undertaken to provide these services up to the school site boundary. There has been confirmation by developer that they will provide tanking service to site, if the sewer is not operational. (3) No (4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(3) No (4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(4a) Yes, but only those associatesd with provision within the school site. (b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(b) Contingencies have been allowed for in the pre-tender estimate over and above the costs normally budgeted for service runs and connections within the school site boundary. These include sewer pump station and rising main $100 000; Fire services water pump station tanks $200 000 [flow rates not yet known] and $150 000 for deep bore after normal bore license application was rejected. (5) No
(5) No
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.