Hon Barry House questions the WA government about a $5 million shortfall in Casino Tax for 2002-2003 and seeks clarification on the budgeted Casino Tax figures for 2002-2003 and 2003-2004. The government attributes the shortfall to lower than budgeted gross casino revenue and expresses confidence in future revenue based on projected revenue and amended tax rates.

AnsweredQoN 1117Legislative Council
Asked
14 August 2003
Portfolio
Racing and Gaming

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the 2003-2004 State Budget, and ask -
(1) Is the Government expecting a shortfall of $5 million in Casino Tax for 2002-2003?
(2) What is the reason for this drop in budgeted Casino Tax from $46 million to $41 million?
(3) Why is the Minister confident that the budget estimate of $47 million in Casino Tax for 2003-2004 will be achieved?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
4 September 2003
Responded by
Minister for Racing and Gaming
Response time
21 days
(1) Yes.
(2) Gross casino revenue for 2002/03 was less than budgeted.
(3) Because of the budgeted gross casino revenue for 2003/04 and the amended casino tax rates set out in Schedule “C” [to be ratified by the Casino (Burswood Island) Agreement Amendment Bill 2003] of the Agreement scheduled to the Casino (Burswood Island) Agreement Act 1985.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more