Hon Tom Stephens questions the Minister for Police regarding the downgrade of the Carnarvon Safer WA committee, funding cuts, and the future of the Community Policing Centre. The Minister's response refers to a previous Parliamentary Question (PQ 62).

AnsweredQoN 138Legislative Council
Asked
8 August 2000
Portfolio
Police

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the Carnarvon Safer WA committee and ask - (1) Can the Minister for Police advise why the committee has been downgraded from district office status? (2) Given that the Geraldton district can now overrule Carnarvon issues, can the Minister guarantee that Carnarvon issues will be given the same consideration by the Executive Committee that they were prior to the downgrade? (3) Can the Minister confirm whether funding to the Carnarvon committee has been cut from $6 000 to $1 500? (4) Does this funding cut have any impact on the future of the Community Policing centre in the shopping centre? (5) Can the Minister guarantee that the long term running costs for the centre will continue to be covered? (6) If not, why not? (7) Will the Minister upgrade the committee to its former status and funding? (8) If not, why not? Answered on 14 September 2000 The Minister

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
14 September 2000
Response time
37 days
Please refer to PQ 62.
(1) Can the Minister for Police advise why the committee has been downgraded from district office status? (2) Given that the Geraldton district can now overrule Carnarvon issues, can the Minister guarantee that Carnarvon issues will be given the same consideration by the Executive Committee that they were prior to the downgrade? (3) Can the Minister confirm whether funding to the Carnarvon committee has been cut from $6 000 to $1 500? (4) Does this funding cut have any impact on the future of the Community Policing centre in the shopping centre? (5) Can the Minister guarantee that the long term running costs for the centre will continue to be covered? (6) If not, why not? (7) Will the Minister upgrade the committee to its former status and funding? (8) If not, why not? Answered on 14 September 2000 The Minister Replied: Please refer to PQ 62.
(2) Given that the Geraldton district can now overrule Carnarvon issues, can the Minister guarantee that Carnarvon issues will be given the same consideration by the Executive Committee that they were prior to the downgrade? (3) Can the Minister confirm whether funding to the Carnarvon committee has been cut from $6 000 to $1 500? (4) Does this funding cut have any impact on the future of the Community Policing centre in the shopping centre? (5) Can the Minister guarantee that the long term running costs for the centre will continue to be covered? (6) If not, why not? (7) Will the Minister upgrade the committee to its former status and funding? (8) If not, why not? Answered on 14 September 2000 The Minister Replied: Please refer to PQ 62.
(3) Can the Minister confirm whether funding to the Carnarvon committee has been cut from $6 000 to $1 500? (4) Does this funding cut have any impact on the future of the Community Policing centre in the shopping centre? (5) Can the Minister guarantee that the long term running costs for the centre will continue to be covered? (6) If not, why not? (7) Will the Minister upgrade the committee to its former status and funding? (8) If not, why not? Answered on 14 September 2000 The Minister Replied: Please refer to PQ 62.
(4) Does this funding cut have any impact on the future of the Community Policing centre in the shopping centre? (5) Can the Minister guarantee that the long term running costs for the centre will continue to be covered? (6) If not, why not? (7) Will the Minister upgrade the committee to its former status and funding? (8) If not, why not? Answered on 14 September 2000 The Minister Replied: Please refer to PQ 62.
(5) Can the Minister guarantee that the long term running costs for the centre will continue to be covered? (6) If not, why not? (7) Will the Minister upgrade the committee to its former status and funding? (8) If not, why not? Answered on 14 September 2000 The Minister Replied: Please refer to PQ 62.
(6) If not, why not? (7) Will the Minister upgrade the committee to its former status and funding? (8) If not, why not? Answered on 14 September 2000 The Minister Replied: Please refer to PQ 62.
(7) Will the Minister upgrade the committee to its former status and funding? (8) If not, why not? Answered on 14 September 2000 The Minister Replied: Please refer to PQ 62.
(8) If not, why not? Answered on 14 September 2000 The Minister Replied: Please refer to PQ 62.
Answered on 14 September 2000 The Minister Replied: Please refer to PQ 62.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more