Hon. Helen Morton questions whether public servants earning less than $100,000 annually were contracted at $150,000 or $200,000 in 2001 and 2005, if their contracts were rolled over, and if they received performance reviews in the past two years.

AnsweredQoN 2839Legislative Council
Asked
8 November 2005
Portfolio
Government Enterprises

QuestionView source ↗

(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
21 March 2006
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Government Enterprises
Response time
133 days
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
(c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more