❓ Mr Bradshaw questions the WA Health portfolio regarding the expenditure of $100,000 allocated for the Yarloop-Harvey Health Service planning in the 2000-2001 budget. The response indicates delays due to ongoing health service planning and the implementation of HARC recommendations.
AnsweredQoN 901Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Was the $100,000 in the 2000-2001 budget for the Yarloop-Harvey Health Service planning spent in the 2000-2001 financial year?
(2) If not, why not?
(3) When will this plan be finalised?
(2) If not, why not?
(3) When will this plan be finalised?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
11 September 2001
Responded by
Minister for Health
Response time
20 days
(2) Contract documentation is on hold until health service planning is finalised, and appropriate facility requirements are determined for this Health Service. (3) Implementation of the Health Administrative Review Committee (HARC) recommendations for all rural Health Services is being undertaken by the HARC implementation committee. The HARC Report (page 17) included the following recommendations for non-metropolitan (country) health services: '7. (i)A review be carried out over a six month period to develop the optimal approach to administration and co-ordination of non-metropolitan Boards and services. 7. (ii) The needs and concerns of non-metropolitan residents, local government and other relevant parties should be sought through an extensive consultation process. This should include consideration of aligning some broad regional boundaries with those used by the Regional Development Commissions in the interests of consistency for planning and other purposes.'
(3) Implementation of the Health Administrative Review Committee (HARC) recommendations for all rural Health Services is being undertaken by the HARC implementation committee. The HARC Report (page 17) included the following recommendations for non-metropolitan (country) health services: '7. (i)A review be carried out over a six month period to develop the optimal approach to administration and co-ordination of non-metropolitan Boards and services. 7. (ii) The needs and concerns of non-metropolitan residents, local government and other relevant parties should be sought through an extensive consultation process. This should include consideration of aligning some broad regional boundaries with those used by the Regional Development Commissions in the interests of consistency for planning and other purposes.'
The HARC Report (page 17) included the following recommendations for non-metropolitan (country) health services: '7. (i)A review be carried out over a six month period to develop the optimal approach to administration and co-ordination of non-metropolitan Boards and services. 7. (ii) The needs and concerns of non-metropolitan residents, local government and other relevant parties should be sought through an extensive consultation process. This should include consideration of aligning some broad regional boundaries with those used by the Regional Development Commissions in the interests of consistency for planning and other purposes.'
'7. (i)A review be carried out over a six month period to develop the optimal approach to administration and co-ordination of non-metropolitan Boards and services. 7. (ii) The needs and concerns of non-metropolitan residents, local government and other relevant parties should be sought through an extensive consultation process. This should include consideration of aligning some broad regional boundaries with those used by the Regional Development Commissions in the interests of consistency for planning and other purposes.'
7. (ii) The needs and concerns of non-metropolitan residents, local government and other relevant parties should be sought through an extensive consultation process. This should include consideration of aligning some broad regional boundaries with those used by the Regional Development Commissions in the interests of consistency for planning and other purposes.'
(3) Implementation of the Health Administrative Review Committee (HARC) recommendations for all rural Health Services is being undertaken by the HARC implementation committee. The HARC Report (page 17) included the following recommendations for non-metropolitan (country) health services: '7. (i)A review be carried out over a six month period to develop the optimal approach to administration and co-ordination of non-metropolitan Boards and services. 7. (ii) The needs and concerns of non-metropolitan residents, local government and other relevant parties should be sought through an extensive consultation process. This should include consideration of aligning some broad regional boundaries with those used by the Regional Development Commissions in the interests of consistency for planning and other purposes.'
The HARC Report (page 17) included the following recommendations for non-metropolitan (country) health services: '7. (i)A review be carried out over a six month period to develop the optimal approach to administration and co-ordination of non-metropolitan Boards and services. 7. (ii) The needs and concerns of non-metropolitan residents, local government and other relevant parties should be sought through an extensive consultation process. This should include consideration of aligning some broad regional boundaries with those used by the Regional Development Commissions in the interests of consistency for planning and other purposes.'
'7. (i)A review be carried out over a six month period to develop the optimal approach to administration and co-ordination of non-metropolitan Boards and services. 7. (ii) The needs and concerns of non-metropolitan residents, local government and other relevant parties should be sought through an extensive consultation process. This should include consideration of aligning some broad regional boundaries with those used by the Regional Development Commissions in the interests of consistency for planning and other purposes.'
7. (ii) The needs and concerns of non-metropolitan residents, local government and other relevant parties should be sought through an extensive consultation process. This should include consideration of aligning some broad regional boundaries with those used by the Regional Development Commissions in the interests of consistency for planning and other purposes.'
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.