❓ Hon Bruce Donaldson asks about the future of Fremantle Port for livestock exports and the potential of James Point as an alternative. Hon Kim Chance responds, highlighting the desirability of an alternative port and discussing potential regional locations and the complexities of James Point.
AnsweredQoN 449Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
FREMANTLE PORT - LIVESTOCK EXPORTS
(1) What is the latest position on the decision for the continuation of Fremantle as the port for the export of livestock? (2) Will a facility be established at James Point for this purpose, which has for a long time been suggested as a far better proposition for livestock export? The PRESIDENT : The Minister for Agriculture and Food, as far as the question relates to his responsibilities. Hon KIM CHANCE
(1) What is the latest position on the decision for the continuation of Fremantle as the port for the export of livestock? (2) Will a facility be established at James Point for this purpose, which has for a long time been suggested as a far better proposition for livestock export? The PRESIDENT : The Minister for Agriculture and Food, as far as the question relates to his responsibilities. Hon KIM CHANCE
AnswerView source ↗
(1)-(2) It is a very interesting question. Hon Bruce Donaldson knows full well that only one member of cabinet can answer that, and that is the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure. However, I am pleased to advise, as I have already done publicly although not in the house, that I think an alternative port to Fremantle is highly desirable in the interest of continuing this state’s live export industry. When I look at the magnificent surroundings of Fremantle today, I find it very difficult to see how its location and environment could be deemed to be compatible with the live export industry. I have spoken to the live exporters at some length about the possibility of their relocating their operations to a regional port, which I think would be much more desirable, but there is a distinct lack of enthusiasm. Hon Norman Moore : Which port do you have in mind? Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
(2) Will a facility be established at James Point for this purpose, which has for a long time been suggested as a far better proposition for livestock export? The PRESIDENT : The Minister for Agriculture and Food, as far as the question relates to his responsibilities. Hon KIM CHANCE replied: (1)-(2) It is a very interesting question. Hon Bruce Donaldson knows full well that only one member of cabinet can answer that, and that is the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure. However, I am pleased to advise, as I have already done publicly although not in the house, that I think an alternative port to Fremantle is highly desirable in the interest of continuing this state’s live export industry. When I look at the magnificent surroundings of Fremantle today, I find it very difficult to see how its location and environment could be deemed to be compatible with the live export industry. I have spoken to the live exporters at some length about the possibility of their relocating their operations to a regional port, which I think would be much more desirable, but there is a distinct lack of enthusiasm. Hon Norman Moore : Which port do you have in mind? Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
The PRESIDENT : The Minister for Agriculture and Food, as far as the question relates to his responsibilities. Hon KIM CHANCE replied: (1)-(2) It is a very interesting question. Hon Bruce Donaldson knows full well that only one member of cabinet can answer that, and that is the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure. However, I am pleased to advise, as I have already done publicly although not in the house, that I think an alternative port to Fremantle is highly desirable in the interest of continuing this state’s live export industry. When I look at the magnificent surroundings of Fremantle today, I find it very difficult to see how its location and environment could be deemed to be compatible with the live export industry. I have spoken to the live exporters at some length about the possibility of their relocating their operations to a regional port, which I think would be much more desirable, but there is a distinct lack of enthusiasm. Hon Norman Moore : Which port do you have in mind? Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: (1)-(2) It is a very interesting question. Hon Bruce Donaldson knows full well that only one member of cabinet can answer that, and that is the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure. However, I am pleased to advise, as I have already done publicly although not in the house, that I think an alternative port to Fremantle is highly desirable in the interest of continuing this state’s live export industry. When I look at the magnificent surroundings of Fremantle today, I find it very difficult to see how its location and environment could be deemed to be compatible with the live export industry. I have spoken to the live exporters at some length about the possibility of their relocating their operations to a regional port, which I think would be much more desirable, but there is a distinct lack of enthusiasm. Hon Norman Moore : Which port do you have in mind? Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
(1)-(2) It is a very interesting question. Hon Bruce Donaldson knows full well that only one member of cabinet can answer that, and that is the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure. However, I am pleased to advise, as I have already done publicly although not in the house, that I think an alternative port to Fremantle is highly desirable in the interest of continuing this state’s live export industry. When I look at the magnificent surroundings of Fremantle today, I find it very difficult to see how its location and environment could be deemed to be compatible with the live export industry. I have spoken to the live exporters at some length about the possibility of their relocating their operations to a regional port, which I think would be much more desirable, but there is a distinct lack of enthusiasm. Hon Norman Moore : Which port do you have in mind? Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
Hon Norman Moore : Which port do you have in mind? Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
(2) Will a facility be established at James Point for this purpose, which has for a long time been suggested as a far better proposition for livestock export? The PRESIDENT : The Minister for Agriculture and Food, as far as the question relates to his responsibilities. Hon KIM CHANCE replied: (1)-(2) It is a very interesting question. Hon Bruce Donaldson knows full well that only one member of cabinet can answer that, and that is the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure. However, I am pleased to advise, as I have already done publicly although not in the house, that I think an alternative port to Fremantle is highly desirable in the interest of continuing this state’s live export industry. When I look at the magnificent surroundings of Fremantle today, I find it very difficult to see how its location and environment could be deemed to be compatible with the live export industry. I have spoken to the live exporters at some length about the possibility of their relocating their operations to a regional port, which I think would be much more desirable, but there is a distinct lack of enthusiasm. Hon Norman Moore : Which port do you have in mind? Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
The PRESIDENT : The Minister for Agriculture and Food, as far as the question relates to his responsibilities. Hon KIM CHANCE replied: (1)-(2) It is a very interesting question. Hon Bruce Donaldson knows full well that only one member of cabinet can answer that, and that is the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure. However, I am pleased to advise, as I have already done publicly although not in the house, that I think an alternative port to Fremantle is highly desirable in the interest of continuing this state’s live export industry. When I look at the magnificent surroundings of Fremantle today, I find it very difficult to see how its location and environment could be deemed to be compatible with the live export industry. I have spoken to the live exporters at some length about the possibility of their relocating their operations to a regional port, which I think would be much more desirable, but there is a distinct lack of enthusiasm. Hon Norman Moore : Which port do you have in mind? Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: (1)-(2) It is a very interesting question. Hon Bruce Donaldson knows full well that only one member of cabinet can answer that, and that is the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure. However, I am pleased to advise, as I have already done publicly although not in the house, that I think an alternative port to Fremantle is highly desirable in the interest of continuing this state’s live export industry. When I look at the magnificent surroundings of Fremantle today, I find it very difficult to see how its location and environment could be deemed to be compatible with the live export industry. I have spoken to the live exporters at some length about the possibility of their relocating their operations to a regional port, which I think would be much more desirable, but there is a distinct lack of enthusiasm. Hon Norman Moore : Which port do you have in mind? Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
(1)-(2) It is a very interesting question. Hon Bruce Donaldson knows full well that only one member of cabinet can answer that, and that is the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure. However, I am pleased to advise, as I have already done publicly although not in the house, that I think an alternative port to Fremantle is highly desirable in the interest of continuing this state’s live export industry. When I look at the magnificent surroundings of Fremantle today, I find it very difficult to see how its location and environment could be deemed to be compatible with the live export industry. I have spoken to the live exporters at some length about the possibility of their relocating their operations to a regional port, which I think would be much more desirable, but there is a distinct lack of enthusiasm. Hon Norman Moore : Which port do you have in mind? Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
Hon Norman Moore : Which port do you have in mind? Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
Hon KIM CHANCE : A number of ports are available, but those that I have most in mind were Esperance, Albany and Geraldton. Geraldton already is a live export port, as are all ports north of Geraldton. Bunbury seems to be off the agenda for a number of understandable reasons. I thought there were opportunities there; however, the live export industry has informed me that its capital commitment is principally in the Baldivis area and it would be unwilling to duplicate that in regional areas. The James Point location is, of course, even closer to Baldivis than it is to Fremantle, so I think it makes sense for the live export industry generally. However, as we are all aware, there are multiple issues with the establishment of a port in that area. It has a considerable history. I discuss it with the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure from time to time, who is well aware of my views on the matter.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.