Hon Helen Morton's question seeks data on public servants in Education and Training earning under $100,000 who were contracted at higher salaries ($150,000/$200,000) in 2001/2005, contract rollovers, and performance reviews. The answer provides detailed figures from various departments.

AnsweredQoN 2829Legislative Council
Asked
8 November 2005
Portfolio
Education and Training

QuestionView source ↗

(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
15 March 2006
Responded by
Minister for Education and Training
Response time
127 days
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
(c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
1. 2001 2005 a) None None b) None None c) None None 2. a) None b) None c) None 3. Not Applicable 4. a) One b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
a) None None b) None None c) None None 2. a) None b) None c) None 3. Not Applicable 4. a) One b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
b) None None c) None None 2. a) None b) None c) None 3. Not Applicable 4. a) One b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
c) None None 2. a) None b) None c) None 3. Not Applicable 4. a) One b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
2. a) None b) None c) None 3. Not Applicable 4. a) One b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
a) None b) None c) None 3. Not Applicable 4. a) One b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
b) None c) None 3. Not Applicable 4. a) One b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
c) None 3. Not Applicable 4. a) One b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
3. Not Applicable 4. a) One b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
4. a) One b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
a) One b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
c) Not Applicable Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
Curriculum Council 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
1. 2001 2005 a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
a) Nil 2 b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
b) Nil 1 c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
b) Nil c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
c) Nil 3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
3. None 4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
4. a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
a) 2 b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
b) 1 c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
c) Not Applicable Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
Department of Education Services 1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
1. 2001 2005 a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
a) Nil Two b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
b) Nil Nil c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
c) Nil Nil 2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
2. a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
a) One b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
b) Nil c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
c) Nil 3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
3. None. 4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
4. a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
a) None. However, performance reviews were undertaken in conjunction with annual monitoring of the Department's operational plan and priorities. b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
b) Not Applicable c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
c) Not Applicable Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
Department of Education and Training 1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
1. 2001 2005 a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
a) 1 21 b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
b) 0 0 c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
c) 1 0 2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
2. a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
a) 3 b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
b) 0 c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
c) 0 3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
3. None 4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
4. a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
a) 16 b) Not Applicable c) 1
b) Not Applicable c) 1
c) 1

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more