❓ A WA parliamentary question asks if the proposed abolition of the Liquor Licensing Court aligns with the Beijing Statement of Principles on judicial independence. The parliamentary secretary representing the Attorney General affirms that it does.
AnsweredQoN 1030Legislative Council
Asked
14 November 2006
Member
Portfolio
parliamentary secretary representing the Attorney General
QuestionView source ↗
LIQUOR LICENSING REFORM - ABOLITION OF LIQUOR LICENSING COURT
(1) Does the government endorse the Beijing Statement of Principles of the Independence of the Judiciary? (2) Is the proposed abolition of the Liquor Licensing Court consistent with principle 29 of that statement? Hon SUE ELLERY
(1) Does the government endorse the Beijing Statement of Principles of the Independence of the Judiciary? (2) Is the proposed abolition of the Liquor Licensing Court consistent with principle 29 of that statement? Hon SUE ELLERY
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes, to the extent that they conform to constitutional arrangements applying to courts and judges. (2) Yes.
(2) Is the proposed abolition of the Liquor Licensing Court consistent with principle 29 of that statement? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes, to the extent that they conform to constitutional arrangements applying to courts and judges. (2) Yes.
Hon SUE ELLERY replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes, to the extent that they conform to constitutional arrangements applying to courts and judges. (2) Yes.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes, to the extent that they conform to constitutional arrangements applying to courts and judges. (2) Yes.
(1) Yes, to the extent that they conform to constitutional arrangements applying to courts and judges. (2) Yes.
(2) Yes.
(2) Is the proposed abolition of the Liquor Licensing Court consistent with principle 29 of that statement? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes, to the extent that they conform to constitutional arrangements applying to courts and judges. (2) Yes.
Hon SUE ELLERY replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes, to the extent that they conform to constitutional arrangements applying to courts and judges. (2) Yes.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes, to the extent that they conform to constitutional arrangements applying to courts and judges. (2) Yes.
(1) Yes, to the extent that they conform to constitutional arrangements applying to courts and judges. (2) Yes.
(2) Yes.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.