Dr. Pettitt questions the discrepancy between the government's response to a parliamentary question regarding climate action campaign spending and information provided to a journalist. The government claims the initial question was too narrow.

AnsweredQoN 677Legislative Council
Asked
12 June 2024
Portfolio
Leader of the House representing the Premier

QuestionView source ↗

GOVERNMENT ADVERTISING — THIS IS CLIMATE
ACTION
677. Hon Dr BRAD PETTITT to the Leader of the House
representing the Premier:
I refer to Paul Murray's
opinion piece in The West Australian of Saturday, 1 June 2024 in which
it was reported that the Cook Labor government disclosed that the campaign
budget for climate action in WA is $2.7 million, and the response to question
without notice 410 on 8 May 2024.
Why was the government unable to give
a figure for the climate action in WA campaign spend when asked in Parliament
on 8 May 2024 but was able to answer the question from Paul Murray
approximately three weeks later?

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the honourable member for
some notice of the question.
Legislative Council question without
notice 410 did not request the budget allocation for the campaign; rather, it
requested the allocation for advertisements and sponsored media posts.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more