❓ WA Parliamentary Question on Notice regarding outstanding creditor payments for various departments and agencies within the Regional Development portfolio as of 31 July 2009. The responses detail the amounts and number of creditors outstanding across different timeframes.
AnsweredQoN 1044Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
For each Department and Agency within the Minister’s portfolios, -
(1) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding for less than or equal to 30 days as at 31 July 2009?
(2) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding for less than or equal to 60 days as at 31 July 2009?
(3) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding for less than or equal to 90 days as at 31 July 2009?
(4) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding for less than or equal to 120 days as at 31 July 2009?
(5) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding more than 120 days as at 31 July 2009?
(1) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding for less than or equal to 30 days as at 31 July 2009?
(2) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding for less than or equal to 60 days as at 31 July 2009?
(3) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding for less than or equal to 90 days as at 31 July 2009?
(4) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding for less than or equal to 120 days as at 31 July 2009?
(5) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding more than 120 days as at 31 July 2009?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
16 September 2009
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development
Response time
36 days
3. NIl 4. $16,621.00 2 Invoices Invoice Amount Invoice Date Invoice Received at GSDC from Shared Services or Supplier Invoice Authorized by GSDC Invoices Returned to OSS for payment Paid by Shared Services 16,500.00 # 30/5/09 25/8/09 26/8/09 26/8/09 2/9/09 121.00 @7/04/09 10/08/09 15/4/09 15/4/09 5/8/09 # This invoice relates to a grant payment which had a number of conditions/milestones attached to it. This supplier dated the invoice prior to milestone requirements being met. GSDC transitioned to Shared Services mid April 2009 and all invoices for the period 1 April to 16 April were taken back to Shared Services centre for payment by Shared Services staff on 16 April 2009. This invoice was one of the batch of invoices taken back to Shared Services as part of the transition process. 5. $115.50 Invoice Amount Invoice Date Invoice Received at GSDC from Shared Services or Supplier Invoice Authorized by GSDC Invoices Returned to OSS for payment Paid by Shared Services 115.50 @ 1/4/09 6/4/09 6/4/09 16/4/09 2/9/09 GSDC transitioned to Shared Services mid April 2009 and all invoices for the period 1 April to 16 April were taken back to Shared Services centre for payment by Shared Services staff on 16 April 2009. This invoice was one of the batch of invoices taken back to Shared Services as part of the transition process. Kimberley Development Commission (1) Number of outstanding creditors as at 31 st July 2009 - 17 - Amount $223,447.25; (2) nil; (3) nil; (4) nil; (5) nil. LandCorp All Creditors Without Retentions Amount $ Number Amount $ Number (1) $2,741,414 247 $2,708,793 243 (2) $718,283 86 $688,583 79 (3) $284,768 34 $268,659 31 (4) $894,684 30 $864,371 24 (5) $2,222,976 146 $343,605 25 Landgate (1) $205,179.66 - 79 creditors (2) $9,385.97 - 6 creditors (3) $62,373.73 - 3 creditors (4) $29,890.56 - one creditor (5) $26,576.16 - one creditor Landgate's policy is to pay its creditors within agreed terms. Reasons for delayed payment could include: · Invoices received late · Disputed invoices which are paid after resolution of the dispute · Invoices received before the goods are received Mid West Development Commission 1) $110,340.18 for 13 creditors is outstanding for 30 days or less 2) $35,426.52 for 3 creditors is outstanding for more than 30 and less than or equal to 60 days 3) Nil 4) Nil 5) Nil Peel Development Commission 1. 5 totalling $14,298.29 2. 7 totalling $148,071.34 3. 2 totalling $6,481.77 4. Nil 5. Nil Pilbara Development Commission (1) $569.47 (One Invoice) July 2009. (2) $16,362.15 (Four Invoices) June 2009. (3) $3653.23 ( Six Invoices) May 2009. (4) $1320.00 (One Invoice) April 2009. (5) Nil Department of Regional Development and Lands (1) $24,222.30 3 (2) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 1) (3) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 2) (4) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 3) (5) Nil South West Development Commission (1) $11,655.83. 6 creditors. (2) - (5) Nil. Wheatbelt Development Commission (1) 25 creditors $48347.55 (2)-(5) Nil Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on http://www.rtlib.com
GSDC transitioned to Shared Services mid April 2009 and all invoices for the period 1 April to 16 April were taken back to Shared Services centre for payment by Shared Services staff on 16 April 2009. This invoice was one of the batch of invoices taken back to Shared Services as part of the transition process. 5. $115.50 Invoice Amount Invoice Date Invoice Received at GSDC from Shared Services or Supplier Invoice Authorized by GSDC Invoices Returned to OSS for payment Paid by Shared Services 115.50 @ 1/4/09 6/4/09 6/4/09 16/4/09 2/9/09 GSDC transitioned to Shared Services mid April 2009 and all invoices for the period 1 April to 16 April were taken back to Shared Services centre for payment by Shared Services staff on 16 April 2009. This invoice was one of the batch of invoices taken back to Shared Services as part of the transition process. Kimberley Development Commission (1) Number of outstanding creditors as at 31 st July 2009 - 17 - Amount $223,447.25; (2) nil; (3) nil; (4) nil; (5) nil. LandCorp All Creditors Without Retentions Amount $ Number Amount $ Number (1) $2,741,414 247 $2,708,793 243 (2) $718,283 86 $688,583 79 (3) $284,768 34 $268,659 31 (4) $894,684 30 $864,371 24 (5) $2,222,976 146 $343,605 25 Landgate (1) $205,179.66 - 79 creditors (2) $9,385.97 - 6 creditors (3) $62,373.73 - 3 creditors (4) $29,890.56 - one creditor (5) $26,576.16 - one creditor Landgate's policy is to pay its creditors within agreed terms. Reasons for delayed payment could include: · Invoices received late · Disputed invoices which are paid after resolution of the dispute · Invoices received before the goods are received Mid West Development Commission 1) $110,340.18 for 13 creditors is outstanding for 30 days or less 2) $35,426.52 for 3 creditors is outstanding for more than 30 and less than or equal to 60 days 3) Nil 4) Nil 5) Nil Peel Development Commission 1. 5 totalling $14,298.29 2. 7 totalling $148,071.34 3. 2 totalling $6,481.77 4. Nil 5. Nil Pilbara Development Commission (1) $569.47 (One Invoice) July 2009. (2) $16,362.15 (Four Invoices) June 2009. (3) $3653.23 ( Six Invoices) May 2009. (4) $1320.00 (One Invoice) April 2009. (5) Nil Department of Regional Development and Lands (1) $24,222.30 3 (2) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 1) (3) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 2) (4) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 3) (5) Nil South West Development Commission (1) $11,655.83. 6 creditors. (2) - (5) Nil. Wheatbelt Development Commission (1) 25 creditors $48347.55 (2)-(5) Nil Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on http://www.rtlib.com
Kimberley Development Commission (1) Number of outstanding creditors as at 31 st July 2009 - 17 - Amount $223,447.25; (2) nil; (3) nil; (4) nil; (5) nil. LandCorp All Creditors Without Retentions Amount $ Number Amount $ Number (1) $2,741,414 247 $2,708,793 243 (2) $718,283 86 $688,583 79 (3) $284,768 34 $268,659 31 (4) $894,684 30 $864,371 24 (5) $2,222,976 146 $343,605 25 Landgate (1) $205,179.66 - 79 creditors (2) $9,385.97 - 6 creditors (3) $62,373.73 - 3 creditors (4) $29,890.56 - one creditor (5) $26,576.16 - one creditor Landgate's policy is to pay its creditors within agreed terms. Reasons for delayed payment could include: · Invoices received late · Disputed invoices which are paid after resolution of the dispute · Invoices received before the goods are received Mid West Development Commission 1) $110,340.18 for 13 creditors is outstanding for 30 days or less 2) $35,426.52 for 3 creditors is outstanding for more than 30 and less than or equal to 60 days 3) Nil 4) Nil 5) Nil Peel Development Commission 1. 5 totalling $14,298.29 2. 7 totalling $148,071.34 3. 2 totalling $6,481.77 4. Nil 5. Nil Pilbara Development Commission (1) $569.47 (One Invoice) July 2009. (2) $16,362.15 (Four Invoices) June 2009. (3) $3653.23 ( Six Invoices) May 2009. (4) $1320.00 (One Invoice) April 2009. (5) Nil Department of Regional Development and Lands (1) $24,222.30 3 (2) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 1) (3) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 2) (4) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 3) (5) Nil South West Development Commission (1) $11,655.83. 6 creditors. (2) - (5) Nil. Wheatbelt Development Commission (1) 25 creditors $48347.55 (2)-(5) Nil Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on http://www.rtlib.com
(1) $205,179.66 - 79 creditors (2) $9,385.97 - 6 creditors (3) $62,373.73 - 3 creditors (4) $29,890.56 - one creditor (5) $26,576.16 - one creditor Landgate's policy is to pay its creditors within agreed terms. Reasons for delayed payment could include: · Invoices received late · Disputed invoices which are paid after resolution of the dispute · Invoices received before the goods are received Mid West Development Commission 1) $110,340.18 for 13 creditors is outstanding for 30 days or less 2) $35,426.52 for 3 creditors is outstanding for more than 30 and less than or equal to 60 days 3) Nil 4) Nil 5) Nil Peel Development Commission 1. 5 totalling $14,298.29 2. 7 totalling $148,071.34 3. 2 totalling $6,481.77 4. Nil 5. Nil Pilbara Development Commission (1) $569.47 (One Invoice) July 2009. (2) $16,362.15 (Four Invoices) June 2009. (3) $3653.23 ( Six Invoices) May 2009. (4) $1320.00 (One Invoice) April 2009. (5) Nil Department of Regional Development and Lands (1) $24,222.30 3 (2) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 1) (3) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 2) (4) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 3) (5) Nil South West Development Commission (1) $11,655.83. 6 creditors. (2) - (5) Nil. Wheatbelt Development Commission (1) 25 creditors $48347.55 (2)-(5) Nil Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on http://www.rtlib.com
GSDC transitioned to Shared Services mid April 2009 and all invoices for the period 1 April to 16 April were taken back to Shared Services centre for payment by Shared Services staff on 16 April 2009. This invoice was one of the batch of invoices taken back to Shared Services as part of the transition process. 5. $115.50 Invoice Amount Invoice Date Invoice Received at GSDC from Shared Services or Supplier Invoice Authorized by GSDC Invoices Returned to OSS for payment Paid by Shared Services 115.50 @ 1/4/09 6/4/09 6/4/09 16/4/09 2/9/09 GSDC transitioned to Shared Services mid April 2009 and all invoices for the period 1 April to 16 April were taken back to Shared Services centre for payment by Shared Services staff on 16 April 2009. This invoice was one of the batch of invoices taken back to Shared Services as part of the transition process. Kimberley Development Commission (1) Number of outstanding creditors as at 31 st July 2009 - 17 - Amount $223,447.25; (2) nil; (3) nil; (4) nil; (5) nil. LandCorp All Creditors Without Retentions Amount $ Number Amount $ Number (1) $2,741,414 247 $2,708,793 243 (2) $718,283 86 $688,583 79 (3) $284,768 34 $268,659 31 (4) $894,684 30 $864,371 24 (5) $2,222,976 146 $343,605 25 Landgate (1) $205,179.66 - 79 creditors (2) $9,385.97 - 6 creditors (3) $62,373.73 - 3 creditors (4) $29,890.56 - one creditor (5) $26,576.16 - one creditor Landgate's policy is to pay its creditors within agreed terms. Reasons for delayed payment could include: · Invoices received late · Disputed invoices which are paid after resolution of the dispute · Invoices received before the goods are received Mid West Development Commission 1) $110,340.18 for 13 creditors is outstanding for 30 days or less 2) $35,426.52 for 3 creditors is outstanding for more than 30 and less than or equal to 60 days 3) Nil 4) Nil 5) Nil Peel Development Commission 1. 5 totalling $14,298.29 2. 7 totalling $148,071.34 3. 2 totalling $6,481.77 4. Nil 5. Nil Pilbara Development Commission (1) $569.47 (One Invoice) July 2009. (2) $16,362.15 (Four Invoices) June 2009. (3) $3653.23 ( Six Invoices) May 2009. (4) $1320.00 (One Invoice) April 2009. (5) Nil Department of Regional Development and Lands (1) $24,222.30 3 (2) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 1) (3) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 2) (4) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 3) (5) Nil South West Development Commission (1) $11,655.83. 6 creditors. (2) - (5) Nil. Wheatbelt Development Commission (1) 25 creditors $48347.55 (2)-(5) Nil Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on http://www.rtlib.com
Kimberley Development Commission (1) Number of outstanding creditors as at 31 st July 2009 - 17 - Amount $223,447.25; (2) nil; (3) nil; (4) nil; (5) nil. LandCorp All Creditors Without Retentions Amount $ Number Amount $ Number (1) $2,741,414 247 $2,708,793 243 (2) $718,283 86 $688,583 79 (3) $284,768 34 $268,659 31 (4) $894,684 30 $864,371 24 (5) $2,222,976 146 $343,605 25 Landgate (1) $205,179.66 - 79 creditors (2) $9,385.97 - 6 creditors (3) $62,373.73 - 3 creditors (4) $29,890.56 - one creditor (5) $26,576.16 - one creditor Landgate's policy is to pay its creditors within agreed terms. Reasons for delayed payment could include: · Invoices received late · Disputed invoices which are paid after resolution of the dispute · Invoices received before the goods are received Mid West Development Commission 1) $110,340.18 for 13 creditors is outstanding for 30 days or less 2) $35,426.52 for 3 creditors is outstanding for more than 30 and less than or equal to 60 days 3) Nil 4) Nil 5) Nil Peel Development Commission 1. 5 totalling $14,298.29 2. 7 totalling $148,071.34 3. 2 totalling $6,481.77 4. Nil 5. Nil Pilbara Development Commission (1) $569.47 (One Invoice) July 2009. (2) $16,362.15 (Four Invoices) June 2009. (3) $3653.23 ( Six Invoices) May 2009. (4) $1320.00 (One Invoice) April 2009. (5) Nil Department of Regional Development and Lands (1) $24,222.30 3 (2) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 1) (3) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 2) (4) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 3) (5) Nil South West Development Commission (1) $11,655.83. 6 creditors. (2) - (5) Nil. Wheatbelt Development Commission (1) 25 creditors $48347.55 (2)-(5) Nil Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on http://www.rtlib.com
(1) $205,179.66 - 79 creditors (2) $9,385.97 - 6 creditors (3) $62,373.73 - 3 creditors (4) $29,890.56 - one creditor (5) $26,576.16 - one creditor Landgate's policy is to pay its creditors within agreed terms. Reasons for delayed payment could include: · Invoices received late · Disputed invoices which are paid after resolution of the dispute · Invoices received before the goods are received Mid West Development Commission 1) $110,340.18 for 13 creditors is outstanding for 30 days or less 2) $35,426.52 for 3 creditors is outstanding for more than 30 and less than or equal to 60 days 3) Nil 4) Nil 5) Nil Peel Development Commission 1. 5 totalling $14,298.29 2. 7 totalling $148,071.34 3. 2 totalling $6,481.77 4. Nil 5. Nil Pilbara Development Commission (1) $569.47 (One Invoice) July 2009. (2) $16,362.15 (Four Invoices) June 2009. (3) $3653.23 ( Six Invoices) May 2009. (4) $1320.00 (One Invoice) April 2009. (5) Nil Department of Regional Development and Lands (1) $24,222.30 3 (2) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 1) (3) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 2) (4) $24,222.30 3 (Note: This includes amounts from question 3) (5) Nil South West Development Commission (1) $11,655.83. 6 creditors. (2) - (5) Nil. Wheatbelt Development Commission (1) 25 creditors $48347.55 (2)-(5) Nil Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.