❓ WA Parliamentary Question on Notice regarding the number of registered, interim, and overdue carers in February 2012, broken down by relative/non-relative status and district. The answer reveals data limitations and provides figures as of March 8, 2012.
AnsweredQoN 5141Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) During the month of February 2012, what was the total number of registered carers with four or more children placed with them by category of relative and non-relative carer, by district?
(2) During the month of February 2012, what was the total number of interim carers with four or more children placed with them by category of relative and non-relative carer, by district?
(3) During the month of February 2012, how many carers had an interim registration for more than 90 days by category of relative and non-relative carer, by district?
(4) During the month of February 2012, how many carers had a 'carer record screening' overdue or not recorded by category of relative and non-relative carer, by district?
(5) During the month of February 2012, how many carers had overdue 'carer reviews' by category of relative and non-relative carer, by district?
(2) During the month of February 2012, what was the total number of interim carers with four or more children placed with them by category of relative and non-relative carer, by district?
(3) During the month of February 2012, how many carers had an interim registration for more than 90 days by category of relative and non-relative carer, by district?
(4) During the month of February 2012, how many carers had a 'carer record screening' overdue or not recorded by category of relative and non-relative carer, by district?
(5) During the month of February 2012, how many carers had overdue 'carer reviews' by category of relative and non-relative carer, by district?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
1 May 2012
Responded by
Minister for Child Protection
Response time
56 days
(1) This data is not retrospectively available. As at 8 March 2012, 56 relative and 73 non-relative approved carers had four or more children placed in the following districts:
Armadale - 3 relative, 9 non-relative
Cannington - 5 relative, 3 non-relative
East Kimberley - 0 relative, 1 non-relative
Fremantle - 6 relative, 4 non-relative
Goldfields - 4 relative, 4 non-relative
Great Southern - 5 relative, 2 non-relative
Joondalup - 4 relative, 12 non-relative
Midland - 4 relative, 3 non-relative
Mirrabooka - 5 relative, 5 non-relative
Murchison - 3 relative, 4 non-relative
Perth - 2 relative, 5 non-relative
Peel - 3 relative, 6 non-relative
Pilbara - 2 relative, 0 non-relative
Rockingham - 4 relative, 4 non-relative
South West - 2 relative, 2 non-relative
West Kimberley - 1 relative, 1 non-relative
Wheatbelt - 3 relative, 7 non-relative
Fostering and Adoption Services - 0 relative and 1 non-relative.
(2) This data is not retrospectively available. As at 8 March 2012, 19 relative carers approved on the basis of an interim assessment had four or more children placed in the following districts:
Armadale - 2 relative
Cannington - 1 relative
Fremantle - 4 relative
Goldfields - 4 relative
Great Southern - 2 relative
Mirrabooka - 2 relative
Peel - 1 relative
Perth - 2 relative
South West - 1 relative.
(3) This data is not retrospectively available. As at 8 March 2012, there were 211 relative and 7 non-relative carer households who were approved on the basis of an interim assessment, with assessments not completed in 90 days and who had children placed in the following districts:
Armadale - 28 relative, 0 non-relative
Cannington - 20 relative, 0 non-relative
East Kimberley - 12 relative, 0 non-relative
Fremantle - 18 relative, 0 non-relative
Goldfields - 24 relative, 2 non-relative
Great Southern - 3 relative, 1 non-relative
Joondalup - 8 relative, 0 non-relative
Midland - 17 relative, 0 non-relative
Mirrabooka - 3 relative, 1 non-relative
Murchison - 11 relative, 1 non-relative
Peel - 17 relative, 1 non-relative
Perth - 8 relative, 1 non-relative
Pilbara - 2 relative, 0 non-relative
Rockingham - 10 relative, 0 non-relative
South West - 8 relative, 0 non-relative
West Kimberley - 13 relative, 0 non-relative
Wheatbelt - 8 relative, 0 non-relative
Fostering and Adoption Services - 1 relative and 0 non-relative.
(4) This data is not retrospectively available. As at 8 March 2012, 30 relative and 5 non-relative approved individual carers had a carer record screening not recorded in the following districts:
Armadale - 1 relative, 0 non-relative
Cannington - 1 relative, 0 non-relative
East Kimberley - 0 relative, 0 non-relative
Fremantle - 4 relative, 1 non-relative
Goldfields - 3 relative, 0 non-relative
Great Southern - 3 relative, 0 non-relative
Joondalup - 4 relative, 1 non-relative
Midland - 2 relative, 0 non-relative
Mirrabooka - 3 relative, 0 non-relative
Murchison - 0 relative, 0 non-relative
Peel - 0 relative, 0 non-relative
Perth - 1 relative, 0 non-relative
Pilbara - 3 relative, 0 non-relative
Rockingham - 1 relative, 0 non-relative
South West - 0 relative, 0 non-relative
West Kimberley - 3 relative, 0 non-relative
Wheatbelt - 1 relative, 1 non-relative
Accommodation and Care Services - 0 relative, 1 non-relative
Fostering and Adoption Services - 0 relative and 1 non-relative.
(5) This data is not retrospectively available. As at 8 March 2012, 368 relative and 185 non-relative carer households with children placed had overdue 'carer reviews' in the following districts:
Armadale - 35 relative, 4 non-relative
Cannington - 38 relative, 15 non-relative
East Kimberley - 13 relative, 2 non-relative
Fremantle - 42 relative, 21 non-relative
Goldfields - 27 relative, 13 non-relative
Great Southern - 12 relative, 8 non-relative
Joondalup - 6 relative, 11 non-relative
Midland - 28 relative, 13 non-relative
Mirrabooka - 18 relative, 13 non-relative
Murchison - 25 relative, 18 non-relative
Peel - 24 relative, 15 non-relative
Perth - 17 relative, 14 non-relative
Pilbara - 21 relative, 2 non-relative
Rockingham - 6 relative, 6 non-relative
South West - 3 relative, 7 non-relative
West Kimberley - 40 relative, 9 non-relative
Wheatbelt - 12 relative, 9 non-relative
Accommodation and Care Services - 0 relative, 2 non-relative
Fostering and Adoption Services - 1 relative and 3 non-relative.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Armadale - 3 relative, 9 non-relative
Cannington - 5 relative, 3 non-relative
East Kimberley - 0 relative, 1 non-relative
Fremantle - 6 relative, 4 non-relative
Goldfields - 4 relative, 4 non-relative
Great Southern - 5 relative, 2 non-relative
Joondalup - 4 relative, 12 non-relative
Midland - 4 relative, 3 non-relative
Mirrabooka - 5 relative, 5 non-relative
Murchison - 3 relative, 4 non-relative
Perth - 2 relative, 5 non-relative
Peel - 3 relative, 6 non-relative
Pilbara - 2 relative, 0 non-relative
Rockingham - 4 relative, 4 non-relative
South West - 2 relative, 2 non-relative
West Kimberley - 1 relative, 1 non-relative
Wheatbelt - 3 relative, 7 non-relative
Fostering and Adoption Services - 0 relative and 1 non-relative.
(2) This data is not retrospectively available. As at 8 March 2012, 19 relative carers approved on the basis of an interim assessment had four or more children placed in the following districts:
Armadale - 2 relative
Cannington - 1 relative
Fremantle - 4 relative
Goldfields - 4 relative
Great Southern - 2 relative
Mirrabooka - 2 relative
Peel - 1 relative
Perth - 2 relative
South West - 1 relative.
(3) This data is not retrospectively available. As at 8 March 2012, there were 211 relative and 7 non-relative carer households who were approved on the basis of an interim assessment, with assessments not completed in 90 days and who had children placed in the following districts:
Armadale - 28 relative, 0 non-relative
Cannington - 20 relative, 0 non-relative
East Kimberley - 12 relative, 0 non-relative
Fremantle - 18 relative, 0 non-relative
Goldfields - 24 relative, 2 non-relative
Great Southern - 3 relative, 1 non-relative
Joondalup - 8 relative, 0 non-relative
Midland - 17 relative, 0 non-relative
Mirrabooka - 3 relative, 1 non-relative
Murchison - 11 relative, 1 non-relative
Peel - 17 relative, 1 non-relative
Perth - 8 relative, 1 non-relative
Pilbara - 2 relative, 0 non-relative
Rockingham - 10 relative, 0 non-relative
South West - 8 relative, 0 non-relative
West Kimberley - 13 relative, 0 non-relative
Wheatbelt - 8 relative, 0 non-relative
Fostering and Adoption Services - 1 relative and 0 non-relative.
(4) This data is not retrospectively available. As at 8 March 2012, 30 relative and 5 non-relative approved individual carers had a carer record screening not recorded in the following districts:
Armadale - 1 relative, 0 non-relative
Cannington - 1 relative, 0 non-relative
East Kimberley - 0 relative, 0 non-relative
Fremantle - 4 relative, 1 non-relative
Goldfields - 3 relative, 0 non-relative
Great Southern - 3 relative, 0 non-relative
Joondalup - 4 relative, 1 non-relative
Midland - 2 relative, 0 non-relative
Mirrabooka - 3 relative, 0 non-relative
Murchison - 0 relative, 0 non-relative
Peel - 0 relative, 0 non-relative
Perth - 1 relative, 0 non-relative
Pilbara - 3 relative, 0 non-relative
Rockingham - 1 relative, 0 non-relative
South West - 0 relative, 0 non-relative
West Kimberley - 3 relative, 0 non-relative
Wheatbelt - 1 relative, 1 non-relative
Accommodation and Care Services - 0 relative, 1 non-relative
Fostering and Adoption Services - 0 relative and 1 non-relative.
(5) This data is not retrospectively available. As at 8 March 2012, 368 relative and 185 non-relative carer households with children placed had overdue 'carer reviews' in the following districts:
Armadale - 35 relative, 4 non-relative
Cannington - 38 relative, 15 non-relative
East Kimberley - 13 relative, 2 non-relative
Fremantle - 42 relative, 21 non-relative
Goldfields - 27 relative, 13 non-relative
Great Southern - 12 relative, 8 non-relative
Joondalup - 6 relative, 11 non-relative
Midland - 28 relative, 13 non-relative
Mirrabooka - 18 relative, 13 non-relative
Murchison - 25 relative, 18 non-relative
Peel - 24 relative, 15 non-relative
Perth - 17 relative, 14 non-relative
Pilbara - 21 relative, 2 non-relative
Rockingham - 6 relative, 6 non-relative
South West - 3 relative, 7 non-relative
West Kimberley - 40 relative, 9 non-relative
Wheatbelt - 12 relative, 9 non-relative
Accommodation and Care Services - 0 relative, 2 non-relative
Fostering and Adoption Services - 1 relative and 3 non-relative.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.