❓ Hon. Norman Moore questions the Minister for State Development regarding potential leaks of cabinet information to Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. The Minister refers back to a previous answer, denying the company was officially informed.
AnsweredQoN 175Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer the minister to the state agreement with Fortescue Metals Group Ltd, and ask - (1) Did the government take any action to discover who informed the company that cabinet was due to decide on the state agreement on 8 November, 2004? (2) If not, why not? (3) If so, what action did the government take? Hon KIM CHANCE
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
(1) Did the government take any action to discover who informed the company that cabinet was due to decide on the state agreement on 8 November, 2004? (2) If not, why not? (3) If so, what action did the government take? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
(2) If not, why not? (3) If so, what action did the government take? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
(3) If so, what action did the government take? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
(1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
(2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
(3) Not applicable.
(1) Did the government take any action to discover who informed the company that cabinet was due to decide on the state agreement on 8 November, 2004? (2) If not, why not? (3) If so, what action did the government take? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
(2) If not, why not? (3) If so, what action did the government take? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
(3) If so, what action did the government take? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
(1) I refer the honourable member to the answer to question 125, in which he was advised that the company was not officially informed when cabinet was to decide on the agreement. (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
(2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable.
(3) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.