Hon Tim Clifford questions the Minister for Environment on the acceptability of fracked gas, given its higher CO2 emissions compared to natural gas and the Paris Agreement. The Minister acknowledges the issue and outlines the government's plan for regulation, offsetting, and investment in renewable energy.

AnsweredQoN 1294Legislative Council
Asked
4 December 2018
Portfolio
Environment

QuestionView source ↗

HYDRAULIC FRACTURING —
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
1294. Hon TIM CLIFFORD to the Minister for Environment:
Given that gas, oil and coal need to
be phased out as a result of the Paris Agreement, will the minister explain why
allowing for fracked gas, which is 10 per cent worse than natural gas, is an
acceptable environmental option in terms of CO 2 emissions?

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the honourable member for
some notice of the question.
Even though the Independent
Scientific Panel Inquiry into Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation in Western Australia concluded that the amount of additional
greenhouse gas emissions resulting from hydraulic fracturing is small, the government
understands that greenhouse gas emissions are an increasingly important issue
for Western Australians.
As I have previously outlined in
this place, in line with the findings and recommendations of the independent
scientific inquiry, the McGowan government considers the avoidance, monitoring,
regulation and offsetting of greenhouse gas emissions as integral to allowing
this industry. In addition, the royalties from any unconventional gas projects
will be used to support new renewable energy projects via the establishment of
a clean energy future fund. An implementation group has been tasked to
determine the means by which this can be achieved in a plan to be delivered in
March 2019.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more