❓ A WA parliamentary question scrutinizes the Health Department's involvement in Liquor Licensing Court cases, particularly regarding extended trading permits and the potential impact of upcoming liquor reforms. The Attorney General defends the department's actions, citing its duty to minimize harm under the existing Act.
AnsweredQoN 1189Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(1) How many court cases does the Director for Public Health or the Health Department currently have in the Liquor Licensing Court?
(2) Who are the licensees involved in those cases?
(3) How many court cases has the Director for Public Health or the Health Department had in the Liquor Licensing Court in each year for the past 5 years?
(4) For each of those cases -
(a) what was the outcome?
(b) who were the licensees involved?
(c) what was nature of the case?
(d) how much did the case cost the Government?
(5) Is the Director of Public Health, State Solicitor or the Health Department currently pursuing or has pursued in the last 12 months any appeals in the Supreme Court against decisions by the Liquor Licensing Court regarding the approval of extended trading permits for Sunday Trading?
(6) Was the Director of Public Health or the State Solicitor approached by any of the licensees involved seeking an adjournment of the case until after the outcome of the Government’s proposed liquor reforms?
(7) Does the Department consider such appeals to be a ‘waste’ of taxpayers’ money given the proposed liquor licensing reforms will allow Sunday trading of liquor in the metropolitan area? If not, why not?
(8) Will the Attorney General put an immediate halt to these cases pending the outcome of the proposed legislation reforms?
(9) Has the Attorney General informed the Minister for Racing and Gaming of the appeals being pursued in the Supreme Court and if so when was he first informed?
(2) Who are the licensees involved in those cases?
(3) How many court cases has the Director for Public Health or the Health Department had in the Liquor Licensing Court in each year for the past 5 years?
(4) For each of those cases -
(a) what was the outcome?
(b) who were the licensees involved?
(c) what was nature of the case?
(d) how much did the case cost the Government?
(5) Is the Director of Public Health, State Solicitor or the Health Department currently pursuing or has pursued in the last 12 months any appeals in the Supreme Court against decisions by the Liquor Licensing Court regarding the approval of extended trading permits for Sunday Trading?
(6) Was the Director of Public Health or the State Solicitor approached by any of the licensees involved seeking an adjournment of the case until after the outcome of the Government’s proposed liquor reforms?
(7) Does the Department consider such appeals to be a ‘waste’ of taxpayers’ money given the proposed liquor licensing reforms will allow Sunday trading of liquor in the metropolitan area? If not, why not?
(8) Will the Attorney General put an immediate halt to these cases pending the outcome of the proposed legislation reforms?
(9) Has the Attorney General informed the Minister for Racing and Gaming of the appeals being pursued in the Supreme Court and if so when was he first informed?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
13 June 2006
Response time
33 days
(b) who were the licensees involved? (c) what was nature of the case? (d) how much did the case cost the Government?
(c) what was nature of the case? (d) how much did the case cost the Government?
(d) how much did the case cost the Government?
(2) The licensees are: · Temregal Pty Ltd; and · Maywood Holdings Pty Ltd. (3) The number of applications dealt with by the Liquor Licensing Court in which the Executive Director, Public Health, has intervened over the past 5 years is as follows: 2001 - 10 2002 - 4 2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
· Temregal Pty Ltd; and · Maywood Holdings Pty Ltd. (3) The number of applications dealt with by the Liquor Licensing Court in which the Executive Director, Public Health, has intervened over the past 5 years is as follows: 2001 - 10 2002 - 4 2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
· Maywood Holdings Pty Ltd. (3) The number of applications dealt with by the Liquor Licensing Court in which the Executive Director, Public Health, has intervened over the past 5 years is as follows: 2001 - 10 2002 - 4 2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
(3) The number of applications dealt with by the Liquor Licensing Court in which the Executive Director, Public Health, has intervened over the past 5 years is as follows: 2001 - 10 2002 - 4 2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
2001 - 10 2002 - 4 2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
2002 - 4 2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
(4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
(5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
(6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
(7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
(8) No. (9) No.
(9) No.
(c) what was nature of the case? (d) how much did the case cost the Government?
(d) how much did the case cost the Government?
(2) The licensees are: · Temregal Pty Ltd; and · Maywood Holdings Pty Ltd. (3) The number of applications dealt with by the Liquor Licensing Court in which the Executive Director, Public Health, has intervened over the past 5 years is as follows: 2001 - 10 2002 - 4 2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
· Temregal Pty Ltd; and · Maywood Holdings Pty Ltd. (3) The number of applications dealt with by the Liquor Licensing Court in which the Executive Director, Public Health, has intervened over the past 5 years is as follows: 2001 - 10 2002 - 4 2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
· Maywood Holdings Pty Ltd. (3) The number of applications dealt with by the Liquor Licensing Court in which the Executive Director, Public Health, has intervened over the past 5 years is as follows: 2001 - 10 2002 - 4 2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
(3) The number of applications dealt with by the Liquor Licensing Court in which the Executive Director, Public Health, has intervened over the past 5 years is as follows: 2001 - 10 2002 - 4 2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
2001 - 10 2002 - 4 2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
2002 - 4 2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
2003 - 3 2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
2004 - 5 2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
2005 - 2 (4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
(4) See attached [tabled paper no _____]. (5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
(5) The Executive Director, Public Health, is appealing against two decisions of the Liquor Licensing Court to grant extended trading permits. (6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
(6) Yes. (7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
(7) No. Under the current Act, the Executive Director, Public Health, is given authority to intervene in proceedings before the licensing authority regarding the harm or ill-health caused by the use of liquor, and the minimization of that harm or ill-health. It would be inappropriate for the Executive Director, Public Health, to anticipate a future decision of Parliament in respect to any changed legislation. In the current cases, the basis of appeal is the question of the considerations that should be taken into account in determining applications for Extended Trading Permits under the Liquor Licensing Act. The judgment of the court will assist the Executive Director, Public Health, in making future decisions relating to potential interventions and may also influence the drafting of any proposed legislative changes. (8) No. (9) No.
(8) No. (9) No.
(9) No.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.