❓ A member of parliament questions the Attorney General regarding the revocation of an indemnity given to ex-sergeant Lewandowski and whether the Director of Public Prosecutions was consulted. The Attorney General denies consultation issues and knowledge of additional charges beyond the existing 21.
AnsweredQoN 238Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Has the Attorney General consulted with the Director of Public Prosecutions, Mr Cock QC, about the extraordinary action of his deputy, Mr Stone, in revoking the indemnity given to ex-sergeant Lewandowski? (2) Is the Attorney General aware of suggestions that Mr Cock QC was not consulted about the decision and does not agree with it? (3) Does the Attorney General agree that the public has a right to know what are the 19 additional charges against ex-sergeant Lewandowski? (4) If so, will he inform the House what the charges are? (5) If not, why not? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(2) Is the Attorney General aware of suggestions that Mr Cock QC was not consulted about the decision and does not agree with it? (3) Does the Attorney General agree that the public has a right to know what are the 19 additional charges against ex-sergeant Lewandowski? (4) If so, will he inform the House what the charges are? (5) If not, why not? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(3) Does the Attorney General agree that the public has a right to know what are the 19 additional charges against ex-sergeant Lewandowski? (4) If so, will he inform the House what the charges are? (5) If not, why not? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(4) If so, will he inform the House what the charges are? (5) If not, why not? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(5) If not, why not? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(5) Not applicable.
(2) Is the Attorney General aware of suggestions that Mr Cock QC was not consulted about the decision and does not agree with it? (3) Does the Attorney General agree that the public has a right to know what are the 19 additional charges against ex-sergeant Lewandowski? (4) If so, will he inform the House what the charges are? (5) If not, why not? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(3) Does the Attorney General agree that the public has a right to know what are the 19 additional charges against ex-sergeant Lewandowski? (4) If so, will he inform the House what the charges are? (5) If not, why not? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(4) If so, will he inform the House what the charges are? (5) If not, why not? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(5) If not, why not? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The Attorney General has provided the following response - (1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(1) No. (2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(2) No. (3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(3) I am not aware of any additional charges to the 21 that have already been laid against Mr Lewandowski. (4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(4) Not applicable. (5) Not applicable.
(5) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.