❓ Hon G.T. Giffard questions the Lands portfolio regarding the selection process for the sale agent of land in Mt Claremont. Hon N.F. Moore clarifies the appointment was an extension of a 1996 competitive tender.
AnsweredQoN 1256Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
LAND AUCTION, MT CLAREMONT
I refer to the sale by public auction of land in Fortview Road, Mt Claremont, to be held on 24 June and ask - (1) Through what process was the sale agent chosen and appointed? (2) Were other agents given the opportunity to tender to act as agent for the sale of the land? (3) If so, how and when was that opportunity given? (4) If not, why not? Hon N.F. MOORE
I refer to the sale by public auction of land in Fortview Road, Mt Claremont, to be held on 24 June and ask - (1) Through what process was the sale agent chosen and appointed? (2) Were other agents given the opportunity to tender to act as agent for the sale of the land? (3) If so, how and when was that opportunity given? (4) If not, why not? Hon N.F. MOORE
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(1) Through what process was the sale agent chosen and appointed? (2) Were other agents given the opportunity to tender to act as agent for the sale of the land? (3) If so, how and when was that opportunity given? (4) If not, why not? Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(2) Were other agents given the opportunity to tender to act as agent for the sale of the land? (3) If so, how and when was that opportunity given? (4) If not, why not? Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(3) If so, how and when was that opportunity given? (4) If not, why not? Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(4) If not, why not? Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(1) Through what process was the sale agent chosen and appointed? (2) Were other agents given the opportunity to tender to act as agent for the sale of the land? (3) If so, how and when was that opportunity given? (4) If not, why not? Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(2) Were other agents given the opportunity to tender to act as agent for the sale of the land? (3) If so, how and when was that opportunity given? (4) If not, why not? Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(3) If so, how and when was that opportunity given? (4) If not, why not? Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(4) If not, why not? Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(1) Appointment made as extension of previous competitive tendering process for appointment of selling agents for St Johns Wood, Mt Claremont. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(3) Not applicable. (4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
(4) Competitive tendering process was completed in July 1996. Agents were assessed and appointment of Satterley Real Estate made. The performance of the agent was reviewed in 1998 and again in 1999 coinciding with the release of the last two stages at Mt Claremont.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.