This parliamentary question scrutinises a specific clause (clause 8) within an unspecified government policy or regulation, focusing on its implications for producers regarding Modern Slavery compliance, supply chain warranties, and obligations on suppliers and contractors. It also probes into the government's assessment of associated compliance costs and whether these obligations exceed existing Commonwealth legislation for Western Australian wine producers.

⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 2630Legislative Assembly
Asked
9 June 2026
Portfolio
the Environment

QuestionView source ↗

(1) Is it correct that clause 8 requires producers to implement and maintain Modern Slavery compliance measures?
(2) Is it correct that clause 8 requires producers to provide warranties concerning Modern Slavery risks within their supply chains?
(3) Is it correct that clause 8 requires producers to impose equivalent obligations on suppliers and contractors?
(4) Has the Government assessed the compliance costs associated with clause 8:
(a) If yes, what was the estimated annual compliance cost per producer?
(5) Has the Government assessed whether the obligations imposed under clause 8 exceed those that would otherwise apply to most Western Australian wine producers under Commonwealth legislation:
(a) If yes, what was the outcome of that assessment?
(6) Will the Minister table any assessment relating to clause 8?
Answered on

AnswerView source ↗

This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more