❓ Hon Barbara Scott questions the accuracy of projected cost savings for cleaning and supplies following the relocation of Woodside Maternity Hospital services to Kaleeya Hospital, specifically focusing on a 90% reduction in cleaning costs and the impact of increased facilities.
AnsweredQoN 3335Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to page 10 of the Feasibility Study of the Relocation of Woodside Maternity Hospital Services to Kaleeya Hospital -
(1) Would the Minister provide a breakdown of the savings of 90 percent on 'cleaning and supplies' which were $ 47 944 a year at Woodside Hospital but drop to $ 4 794 at Kaleeya Hospital?
(2) Was this estimate provided by Health Project Directors Australia and Health Projects International?
(3) If not, who provided this estimate?
(4) Was this estimate checked by Project Directors Australia and Health Projects International?
(5) If not, who checked this estimate?
(6) What is the most recent estimate of the annual saving on 'cleaning and supplies' resulting from the move to Kaleeya?
(7) How many extra toilets and shower will there be to clean in the obstetrics section of Kaleeya Hospital compared to Woodside Hospital?
(8) Was this extra work taken into account when the costs were reduced to nothing?
(1) Would the Minister provide a breakdown of the savings of 90 percent on 'cleaning and supplies' which were $ 47 944 a year at Woodside Hospital but drop to $ 4 794 at Kaleeya Hospital?
(2) Was this estimate provided by Health Project Directors Australia and Health Projects International?
(3) If not, who provided this estimate?
(4) Was this estimate checked by Project Directors Australia and Health Projects International?
(5) If not, who checked this estimate?
(6) What is the most recent estimate of the annual saving on 'cleaning and supplies' resulting from the move to Kaleeya?
(7) How many extra toilets and shower will there be to clean in the obstetrics section of Kaleeya Hospital compared to Woodside Hospital?
(8) Was this extra work taken into account when the costs were reduced to nothing?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
2 May 2006
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Health
Response time
42 days
2. No. 3. South Metropolitan Area Health Service. 4. No. 5. South Metropolitan Area Health Service. 6. The original estimate has not been amended. 7. 7 additional toilets. 5 additional showers. 8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
3. South Metropolitan Area Health Service. 4. No. 5. South Metropolitan Area Health Service. 6. The original estimate has not been amended. 7. 7 additional toilets. 5 additional showers. 8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
4. No. 5. South Metropolitan Area Health Service. 6. The original estimate has not been amended. 7. 7 additional toilets. 5 additional showers. 8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
5. South Metropolitan Area Health Service. 6. The original estimate has not been amended. 7. 7 additional toilets. 5 additional showers. 8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
6. The original estimate has not been amended. 7. 7 additional toilets. 5 additional showers. 8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
7. 7 additional toilets. 5 additional showers. 8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
3. South Metropolitan Area Health Service. 4. No. 5. South Metropolitan Area Health Service. 6. The original estimate has not been amended. 7. 7 additional toilets. 5 additional showers. 8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
4. No. 5. South Metropolitan Area Health Service. 6. The original estimate has not been amended. 7. 7 additional toilets. 5 additional showers. 8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
5. South Metropolitan Area Health Service. 6. The original estimate has not been amended. 7. 7 additional toilets. 5 additional showers. 8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
6. The original estimate has not been amended. 7. 7 additional toilets. 5 additional showers. 8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
7. 7 additional toilets. 5 additional showers. 8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
8. There will not be additional costs at Kaleeya, utilising existing toilets and showers that were used previously.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.