Hon Aaron Stonehouse asks the Attorney General when a government response to the damning review of the Criminal Property Confiscation Act will be provided, given the time elapsed since its tabling. The Attorney General cites the government's law reform agenda and the COVID-19 pandemic as reasons for the delay.

AnsweredQoN 419Legislative Council
Asked
13 May 2020
Portfolio
Leader of the House representing the Attorney General

QuestionView source ↗

CRIMINAL PROPERTY
CONFISCATION ACT — REVIEW
419. Hon AARON STONEHOUSE to the Leader of the House
representing the Attorney General:
I
refer the Attorney General to the review of the Criminal Property Confiscation
Act undertaken by Hon Wayne Martin and
tabled in the other place, without comment, late last year. Given how damning
the report was and having had more than four months since its tabling to
consider the recommendations set out in the report, will the Attorney General
share with us his expectations as to when we might expect a government
response?

AnswerView source ↗

I draw the house's attention
to what has been going on for the last four months; I do not know whether
anyone has noticed! But I thank the member for the question and provide the
following answer.
Due to the government's
significant law reform agenda and the precedence of addressing urgent matters
related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the report of Hon Wayne Martin, QC, remains
under consideration.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more