A parliamentary question seeks information on lobbying activities by CPR Communications on behalf of Anaconda regarding the Officer Basin project. The Minister provides a partial answer, citing resource constraints for a comprehensive response from all departments and agencies.

AnsweredQoN 701Legislative Council
Asked
22 May 2002
Portfolio
Goldfields-Esperance

QuestionView source ↗

(1) Have you, or any of your Departments or Agencies been lobbied by CPR Communications and Public Relations Pty Ltd?
(2) If so -
(a) in each case, on whose behalf was the lobbying conducted and what were the issue/s or the subject of the approach; and
(b) what was the outcome of each approach?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
19 June 2002
Responded by
Minister for Goldfields-Esperance
Response time
28 days
(b) what was the outcome of each approach?
(2) (a) On behalf of Anaconda. The issue was "the Officer Basin project". (b) I was advised of Anaconda's views on the issue. But with respect to Departments or Agencies for which I have responsibility the resources required to answer such a general and ill-defined question would involve an unjustified expense. If the member has a specific question relating to a particular meeting, an answer can be provided.
(b) I was advised of Anaconda's views on the issue. But with respect to Departments or Agencies for which I have responsibility the resources required to answer such a general and ill-defined question would involve an unjustified expense. If the member has a specific question relating to a particular meeting, an answer can be provided.
But with respect to Departments or Agencies for which I have responsibility the resources required to answer such a general and ill-defined question would involve an unjustified expense. If the member has a specific question relating to a particular meeting, an answer can be provided.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more