❓ Hon. Norman Moore questions the Minister for Education regarding a potentially misleading capital expenditure figure of $9 million for the Fitzroy Crossing District High School in the 2006-07 budget. The Minister acknowledges the figure was provided by the department, attributing the discrepancy to underestimated impacts of project delays.
AnsweredQoN 1261Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
FITZROY CROSSING DISTRICT HIGH SCHOOL 1261. Hon NORMAN MOORE to the minister representing the Minister for Education and Training: I could have given those answers, and there are a lot of them. Did log say something? Hon Ken Travers : I am a mere sapling compared with you. Hon NORMAN MOORE : He is a big streak of misery. If I am asked to make a speech about the last question I asked, I am happy to do that because I did not get an answer for a very good reason. I refer the Minister for Education and Training to his reply to question without notice 1220 concerning the new Fitzroy Crossing District High School. (1) Was the capital expenditure figure of $9 million on the school for 2006-07 as published in the budget papers provided by the department? (2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
FITZROY CROSSING DISTRICT HIGH SCHOOL
I could have given those answers, and there are a lot of them. Did log say something? Hon Ken Travers : I am a mere sapling compared with you. Hon NORMAN MOORE : He is a big streak of misery. If I am asked to make a speech about the last question I asked, I am happy to do that because I did not get an answer for a very good reason. I refer the Minister for Education and Training to his reply to question without notice 1220 concerning the new Fitzroy Crossing District High School. (1) Was the capital expenditure figure of $9 million on the school for 2006-07 as published in the budget papers provided by the department? (2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
Hon Ken Travers : I am a mere sapling compared with you. Hon NORMAN MOORE : He is a big streak of misery. If I am asked to make a speech about the last question I asked, I am happy to do that because I did not get an answer for a very good reason. I refer the Minister for Education and Training to his reply to question without notice 1220 concerning the new Fitzroy Crossing District High School. (1) Was the capital expenditure figure of $9 million on the school for 2006-07 as published in the budget papers provided by the department? (2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
Hon NORMAN MOORE : He is a big streak of misery. If I am asked to make a speech about the last question I asked, I am happy to do that because I did not get an answer for a very good reason. I refer the Minister for Education and Training to his reply to question without notice 1220 concerning the new Fitzroy Crossing District High School. (1) Was the capital expenditure figure of $9 million on the school for 2006-07 as published in the budget papers provided by the department? (2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
I refer the Minister for Education and Training to his reply to question without notice 1220 concerning the new Fitzroy Crossing District High School. (1) Was the capital expenditure figure of $9 million on the school for 2006-07 as published in the budget papers provided by the department? (2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
(1) Was the capital expenditure figure of $9 million on the school for 2006-07 as published in the budget papers provided by the department? (2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
(2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
(1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
(2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
FITZROY CROSSING DISTRICT HIGH SCHOOL
I could have given those answers, and there are a lot of them. Did log say something? Hon Ken Travers : I am a mere sapling compared with you. Hon NORMAN MOORE : He is a big streak of misery. If I am asked to make a speech about the last question I asked, I am happy to do that because I did not get an answer for a very good reason. I refer the Minister for Education and Training to his reply to question without notice 1220 concerning the new Fitzroy Crossing District High School. (1) Was the capital expenditure figure of $9 million on the school for 2006-07 as published in the budget papers provided by the department? (2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
Hon Ken Travers : I am a mere sapling compared with you. Hon NORMAN MOORE : He is a big streak of misery. If I am asked to make a speech about the last question I asked, I am happy to do that because I did not get an answer for a very good reason. I refer the Minister for Education and Training to his reply to question without notice 1220 concerning the new Fitzroy Crossing District High School. (1) Was the capital expenditure figure of $9 million on the school for 2006-07 as published in the budget papers provided by the department? (2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
Hon NORMAN MOORE : He is a big streak of misery. If I am asked to make a speech about the last question I asked, I am happy to do that because I did not get an answer for a very good reason. I refer the Minister for Education and Training to his reply to question without notice 1220 concerning the new Fitzroy Crossing District High School. (1) Was the capital expenditure figure of $9 million on the school for 2006-07 as published in the budget papers provided by the department? (2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
I refer the Minister for Education and Training to his reply to question without notice 1220 concerning the new Fitzroy Crossing District High School. (1) Was the capital expenditure figure of $9 million on the school for 2006-07 as published in the budget papers provided by the department? (2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
(1) Was the capital expenditure figure of $9 million on the school for 2006-07 as published in the budget papers provided by the department? (2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
(2) If so, will the minister explain why the department provided a misleading figure for budget presentation to Parliament, as it did not reflect the true situation as reflected in the minister’s previous answer that makes it clear the project was delayed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. On behalf of the Minister for Education and Training I provide the following reply - (1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
(1) Yes. (2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
(2) The Department of Education and Training underestimated the impacts of the significant delays associated with the project on the expenditure for 2006-07.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.