Home›Questions on Notice›QoN 700

❓ Question on Notice regarding a fatal motor vehicle accident on the Broome-Derby road involving stray animals, seeking information on fencing, advisory groups, signage, and legal responsibilities of pastoralists. The Attorney General redirected most questions to other portfolios and advised seeking independent legal advice.

AnsweredQoN 700Legislative Council

Asked

18 February 2014

Member

Hon Robin Chapple

Portfolio

Attorney General

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the motor vehicle accident on the Broome-Derby road (Derby Highway) on Friday, 20 December 2013 that claimed the life of a 13 year-old girl, question without notice No. 17 asked in the Legislative Council on 14 May 2013, Australian Standard 1742.2 (1994), Section 3.11.2.7, the Main Roads special Stray Animals signs, the Highways (Liability for Straying Animals) Act 1983 , and the Pastoral Lands Board Liability for Straying Stock on Roads document located at: http://www.lands.wa.gov.au/Publications/Documents/Pastoral-Lands-Liability-for-Straying-Stock-on-Roads.pdf : (a) is or has the road been fenced by the pastoralists for the sections of the stations Roebuck Plains and Yeeda Stations that interact with the Derby Highway; (b) if yes to (a), on what date was this/these areas last fenced; (c) is or has the road been fenced by the lessees or owners of the Knowsley Agricultural Area that interact with the Derby Highway; (d) if yes to (c), on what date was this/these areas last fenced; (e) is or has the road been fenced by the owners of Freehold Lot 103 of Plan Number 215040 that interact with the Derby Highway; (f) if yes to (e), on what date was this area last fenced; (g) on what specific date was the advisory group for the management of straying livestock in pastoral regions set up in 2012; (h) how many times has that advisory group met since its inception and on what dates; (i) who are the members of that group and which organisations do they represent; (j) does this advisory group keep minutes of their meetings; (k) if yes to (j), will the Minister table those minutes; (l) if no to (j), why not; (m) if no to (l), why not; (n) does this advisory group provide updates of their activities/progress to the Minister; (o) if yes to (n), will the Minister table them; (p) if no to (n), why not; (q) if no to (o), why not; (r) is a secretariat provided by a department and, if so, by which department; (s) what progress to date has the advisory group made in managing or making recommendations to the Minister in respect of the management of straying livestock in pastoral regions; (t) in what way is the Main Roads' fencing policy similar to that of its Queensland counterpart; (u) is it a requirement that pastoral leases should be fenced to manage straying livestock interacting with road users; (v) if no to (u), why not; (w) does the nature and amount of traffic using the Derby Highway mean that it meets the criteria required by the Highways (Liability for Straying Animals) Act 1983 ; (x) if no to (w), why not; (y) does the Highways (Liability for Straying Animals) Act 1983 have effect in all clauses to the Derby Highway; (z) if no to (y), why not; (aa) will the Minister Table a copy of the Australian Standard 1742.2 (1994); (bb) if no to (aa), why not; (cc) in relation to the Main Roads special Stray Animals signs, how many are placed on either side of the Derby Highway; (dd) at what intervals are these signs placed along either side of the Derby Highway; (ee) if there is not uniformity in relation to the distances of the placement of these signs along either side of the Derby Highway, can the Minister explain why; (ff) how many of these signs are the primary warning signs and how many are supplementary warning signs; (gg) why is there inconstancy between the Highways (Liability for Straying Animals) Act 1983 , the Pastoral lands board document and the Main Roads Stray Animals website 2.2 Background statement; and (hh) do pastoralists, particularly those whose properties adjoining highways, have a legal responsibility for stock that stray onto these roadways?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered

19 March 2014

Response time

29 days

The
Highway (Liability for Straying Animals) Act 1983
(the Act) provides that the maximum recoverable in any one cause of action for negligence arising out of damage caused by animals straying on to a highway shall not exceed $500,000 and contains the factors the court should consider in making any determination.
I remind the Member that Standing Order 105 provides that questions should not seek legal advice and I recommend that he seek independent legal advice if he requires clarification on any of the provisions contained in the
Act
.
The other matters raised by the Member fall under the Regional Development, Lands and Transport portfolios and should redirected accordingly.

View on Parliament of WA