❓ A parliamentary question seeks details about legal advice regarding the Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee's handling of culturally sensitive information, particularly concerning female officers accessing male-restricted information. The answer invokes legal professional privilege, limiting transparency.
AnsweredQoN 3191Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee (ACMC) minutes, dated 21 November 2012, and I ask: (a) what was the nature of the advice, dated 5 November 2012, from the State Solicitor's Office concerning the Committee's ability to consider culturally or gender sensitive information; (b) did this advice provide advice on whether a female officer in the Department of Aboriginal Affairs or the ACMC could view male restricted information; and (c) if yes to (b), why?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
9 September 2015
Responded by
Minister for Aboriginal Affairs
Response time
85 days
a. This is subject to legal professional privilege.
b. Yes.
c. This advice is subject to legal professional privilege.
b. Yes.
c. This advice is subject to legal professional privilege.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.