❓ A WA parliamentary question regarding the necessity and cost of duplicating the Stirling Bridge, with the response indicating it's not currently considered necessary or costed.
AnsweredQoN 3244Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) what is the estimated cost; (c) what advance studies have been done to indicate that this project is necessary; and (d) in view of the enormous expenditure on the South West Metropolitan Railway, will the Minister review the necessity for this project?
(c) what advance studies have been done to indicate that this project is necessary; and (d) in view of the enormous expenditure on the South West Metropolitan Railway, will the Minister review the necessity for this project?
(d) in view of the enormous expenditure on the South West Metropolitan Railway, will the Minister review the necessity for this project?
(2) No detailed costings have been prepared for this proposal. (3) The proposal is not considered necessary at this stage from an economic or traffic demand basis. Main Roads is not aware of any studies which indicate duplication would be required at this time, or in the near future. (4) Not applicable.
(3) The proposal is not considered necessary at this stage from an economic or traffic demand basis. Main Roads is not aware of any studies which indicate duplication would be required at this time, or in the near future. (4) Not applicable.
(4) Not applicable.
(c) what advance studies have been done to indicate that this project is necessary; and (d) in view of the enormous expenditure on the South West Metropolitan Railway, will the Minister review the necessity for this project?
(d) in view of the enormous expenditure on the South West Metropolitan Railway, will the Minister review the necessity for this project?
(2) No detailed costings have been prepared for this proposal. (3) The proposal is not considered necessary at this stage from an economic or traffic demand basis. Main Roads is not aware of any studies which indicate duplication would be required at this time, or in the near future. (4) Not applicable.
(3) The proposal is not considered necessary at this stage from an economic or traffic demand basis. Main Roads is not aware of any studies which indicate duplication would be required at this time, or in the near future. (4) Not applicable.
(4) Not applicable.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
26 November 2004
Responded by
Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
38 days
(1) Main Roads is not aware of the advice referred to. However, any future duplication of the Stirling Bridge is considered to be a very long term proposal and is not included on Main Roads' current program.
(2) No detailed costings have been prepared for this proposal.
(3) The proposal is not considered necessary at this stage from an economic or traffic demand basis. Main Roads is not aware of any studies which indicate duplication would be required at this time, or in the near future.
(4) Not applicable.
(2) No detailed costings have been prepared for this proposal.
(3) The proposal is not considered necessary at this stage from an economic or traffic demand basis. Main Roads is not aware of any studies which indicate duplication would be required at this time, or in the near future.
(4) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.