❓ A WA parliamentary question addresses berthing delays at Geraldton Port in June 2011, inquiring about the reasons, duration, costs, and a proposed breakwater extension to mitigate future delays.
AnsweredQoN 553Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
GERALDTON PORT — BERTHING DELAYS
I refer to reports in the Geraldton Guardian dated 22 June regarding the forced offshore anchorage of ships seeking to load and unload at Geraldton port. (1) Can the minister confirm that a number of ships were unable to dock in June; and, if so, why? (2) How long were ships required to anchor offshore? (3) What holding costs were incurred because of delays in entering Geraldton port? (4) Does the minister support a recommendation from New Zealand–based MetOcean Solutions Ltd to extend the existing 170 metre-long breakwater by 350 metres, thereby providing an approximate 50 per cent reduction in swell wave heights and a 30 per cent reduction in long wave heights within the harbour? Hon SIMON O’BRIEN
I refer to reports in the Geraldton Guardian dated 22 June regarding the forced offshore anchorage of ships seeking to load and unload at Geraldton port. (1) Can the minister confirm that a number of ships were unable to dock in June; and, if so, why? (2) How long were ships required to anchor offshore? (3) What holding costs were incurred because of delays in entering Geraldton port? (4) Does the minister support a recommendation from New Zealand–based MetOcean Solutions Ltd to extend the existing 170 metre-long breakwater by 350 metres, thereby providing an approximate 50 per cent reduction in swell wave heights and a 30 per cent reduction in long wave heights within the harbour? Hon SIMON O’BRIEN
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(1) Can the minister confirm that a number of ships were unable to dock in June; and, if so, why? (2) How long were ships required to anchor offshore? (3) What holding costs were incurred because of delays in entering Geraldton port? (4) Does the minister support a recommendation from New Zealand–based MetOcean Solutions Ltd to extend the existing 170 metre-long breakwater by 350 metres, thereby providing an approximate 50 per cent reduction in swell wave heights and a 30 per cent reduction in long wave heights within the harbour? Hon SIMON O’BRIEN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(2) How long were ships required to anchor offshore? (3) What holding costs were incurred because of delays in entering Geraldton port? (4) Does the minister support a recommendation from New Zealand–based MetOcean Solutions Ltd to extend the existing 170 metre-long breakwater by 350 metres, thereby providing an approximate 50 per cent reduction in swell wave heights and a 30 per cent reduction in long wave heights within the harbour? Hon SIMON O’BRIEN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(3) What holding costs were incurred because of delays in entering Geraldton port? (4) Does the minister support a recommendation from New Zealand–based MetOcean Solutions Ltd to extend the existing 170 metre-long breakwater by 350 metres, thereby providing an approximate 50 per cent reduction in swell wave heights and a 30 per cent reduction in long wave heights within the harbour? Hon SIMON O’BRIEN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(4) Does the minister support a recommendation from New Zealand–based MetOcean Solutions Ltd to extend the existing 170 metre-long breakwater by 350 metres, thereby providing an approximate 50 per cent reduction in swell wave heights and a 30 per cent reduction in long wave heights within the harbour? Hon SIMON O’BRIEN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
Hon SIMON O’BRIEN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(1) Can the minister confirm that a number of ships were unable to dock in June; and, if so, why? (2) How long were ships required to anchor offshore? (3) What holding costs were incurred because of delays in entering Geraldton port? (4) Does the minister support a recommendation from New Zealand–based MetOcean Solutions Ltd to extend the existing 170 metre-long breakwater by 350 metres, thereby providing an approximate 50 per cent reduction in swell wave heights and a 30 per cent reduction in long wave heights within the harbour? Hon SIMON O’BRIEN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(2) How long were ships required to anchor offshore? (3) What holding costs were incurred because of delays in entering Geraldton port? (4) Does the minister support a recommendation from New Zealand–based MetOcean Solutions Ltd to extend the existing 170 metre-long breakwater by 350 metres, thereby providing an approximate 50 per cent reduction in swell wave heights and a 30 per cent reduction in long wave heights within the harbour? Hon SIMON O’BRIEN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(3) What holding costs were incurred because of delays in entering Geraldton port? (4) Does the minister support a recommendation from New Zealand–based MetOcean Solutions Ltd to extend the existing 170 metre-long breakwater by 350 metres, thereby providing an approximate 50 per cent reduction in swell wave heights and a 30 per cent reduction in long wave heights within the harbour? Hon SIMON O’BRIEN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(4) Does the minister support a recommendation from New Zealand–based MetOcean Solutions Ltd to extend the existing 170 metre-long breakwater by 350 metres, thereby providing an approximate 50 per cent reduction in swell wave heights and a 30 per cent reduction in long wave heights within the harbour? Hon SIMON O’BRIEN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
Hon SIMON O’BRIEN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(1) Berthing delays due to surge in Geraldton harbour were experienced on 2 and 3 June 2011, and in the period from 15 to 21 June 2011. (2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(2) These berthing delays had the following durations: 2 June, 16 hours; 3 June, seven hours; 15 to 21 June, 144 hours. (3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(3) The liability for delay and demurrage costs is determined by contract terms between the relevant parties—shipowner, charterer, cargo owner and/or exporter. Such commercial information is not supplied to the government or to the Geraldton Port Authority. (4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
(4) This report from MetOcean Solutions has identified, by mathematical modelling, that a 350-metre breakwater extension will reduce loads on mooring lines by 40 per cent. However, the modelling did not consider the consequential effects on the surrounding beaches, or the amenity impacts on the community. Until further investigations are completed, the project is fully costed and its feasibility assessed, it is premature to support the initiative.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.