❓ A parliamentary question regarding the environmental impact assessment of a proposed development at Emu Point, Albany. The Minister confirms an assessment is underway but awaiting the proponent's draft review.
AnsweredQoN 481Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
EMU POINT, ALBANY — PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
I refer to the proposed development by LandCorp at Emu Point in Albany. (1) Is the development subject to an environmental impact assessment in accordance with the provisions of section 38 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986? (2) If no to (1), why not? (3) If yes to (1), at what stage is the environmental impact assessment at? Hon SALLY TALBOT
I refer to the proposed development by LandCorp at Emu Point in Albany. (1) Is the development subject to an environmental impact assessment in accordance with the provisions of section 38 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986? (2) If no to (1), why not? (3) If yes to (1), at what stage is the environmental impact assessment at? Hon SALLY TALBOT
AnswerView source ↗
I thank Hon Paul Llewellyn for some notice of this question, to which the Minister for the Environment has provided an answer in the following terms — (1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
(1) Is the development subject to an environmental impact assessment in accordance with the provisions of section 38 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986? (2) If no to (1), why not? (3) If yes to (1), at what stage is the environmental impact assessment at? Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Paul Llewellyn for some notice of this question, to which the Minister for the Environment has provided an answer in the following terms — (1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
(2) If no to (1), why not? (3) If yes to (1), at what stage is the environmental impact assessment at? Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Paul Llewellyn for some notice of this question, to which the Minister for the Environment has provided an answer in the following terms — (1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
(3) If yes to (1), at what stage is the environmental impact assessment at? Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Paul Llewellyn for some notice of this question, to which the Minister for the Environment has provided an answer in the following terms — (1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Paul Llewellyn for some notice of this question, to which the Minister for the Environment has provided an answer in the following terms — (1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
I thank Hon Paul Llewellyn for some notice of this question, to which the Minister for the Environment has provided an answer in the following terms — (1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
(1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
(2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
(3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
(1) Is the development subject to an environmental impact assessment in accordance with the provisions of section 38 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986? (2) If no to (1), why not? (3) If yes to (1), at what stage is the environmental impact assessment at? Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Paul Llewellyn for some notice of this question, to which the Minister for the Environment has provided an answer in the following terms — (1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
(2) If no to (1), why not? (3) If yes to (1), at what stage is the environmental impact assessment at? Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Paul Llewellyn for some notice of this question, to which the Minister for the Environment has provided an answer in the following terms — (1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
(3) If yes to (1), at what stage is the environmental impact assessment at? Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Paul Llewellyn for some notice of this question, to which the Minister for the Environment has provided an answer in the following terms — (1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Paul Llewellyn for some notice of this question, to which the Minister for the Environment has provided an answer in the following terms — (1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
I thank Hon Paul Llewellyn for some notice of this question, to which the Minister for the Environment has provided an answer in the following terms — (1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
(1) Yes. On 25 June 2007 the Environmental Protection Authority made a decision to assess the proposed development as a public environmental review with a review period of four weeks. (2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
(2) Not applicable. (3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
(3) The EPA is awaiting the submission of the proponent’s draft public environmental review. The proponent has not indicated to the EPA when the document will be submitted.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.