❓ Question on Notice inquiring about instances of repeat, non-tendered goods or services procured by agencies within the Minister's portfolio, valued between $50,000 and $250,000, and the reasons for not going to tender. The answer refers to another question.
AnsweredQoN 5911Legislative Assembly
Asked
10 December 2019
Member
Portfolio
Environment; Disability Services; Electoral Affairs
QuestionView source ↗
Consistent with the State Supply Commission Open and Effective Competition Policy, in the past financial year was there any repeat (i.e. ad-hoc monthly supply without going to tender) good or service supplied to any agency, department, government trading enterprise or board within the Minister's portfolio with a monetary value from $50,000 up to $250,000, and if so: (a) What was the nature of the good or service repeatedly supplied; (b) What was the individual value of (a); (c) Why was this not put out to a tender process; and (d) What officers were responsible for the initial procurement and invoice payment of each supply?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
11 February 2020
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Environment; Disability Services; Electoral Affairs
Response time
1 days
Please refer to Legislative Assembly Question on Notice 5908.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.