This parliamentary question concerns the Office of Health Review and a summary prosecution commenced in 2003 for an alleged contravention of the Health Services (Conciliation and Review) Act 1995. The question refers back to a previous question asked in April 2003.

AnsweredQoN 23Legislative Council
Asked
29 March 2005
Portfolio
Health

QuestionView source ↗

(b) 2002; or (c) 2003?
(c) 2003?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
3 May 2005
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Health
Response time
35 days
This Legislative Council parliamentary question on notice was asked by the Hon Member on 1 April 2003 in the range of 592-622 and responses were provided by all Ministers. Answers appeared on 7 May - 9 May 2003 Hansard. OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (1) (a-b) No. (c) Yes (see below). (2) Summary prosecution commenced in 2003 in the Court of Petty Sessions for an alleged contravention of section 62 of the Health Services (Conciliation and Review) Act 1995.
Answers appeared on 7 May - 9 May 2003 Hansard. OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (1) (a-b) No. (c) Yes (see below). (2) Summary prosecution commenced in 2003 in the Court of Petty Sessions for an alleged contravention of section 62 of the Health Services (Conciliation and Review) Act 1995.
OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (1) (a-b) No. (c) Yes (see below). (2) Summary prosecution commenced in 2003 in the Court of Petty Sessions for an alleged contravention of section 62 of the Health Services (Conciliation and Review) Act 1995.
(1) (a-b) No. (c) Yes (see below). (2) Summary prosecution commenced in 2003 in the Court of Petty Sessions for an alleged contravention of section 62 of the Health Services (Conciliation and Review) Act 1995.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more