A parliamentary question regarding a $296 million change in the 2011-12 quarterly financial results, with the questioning member accusing the Treasurer of being deliberately obscure. The Treasurer denies hiding the information.

AnsweredQoN 867Legislative Assembly
Asked
30 November 2011
Portfolio
Treasurer

QuestionView source ↗

2011–12 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RESULTS REPORT: SEPTEMBER 2011 — OPERATING SURPLUS
I have a supplementary question. Why was the Treasurer so tricky that he left it to a footnote in the budget papers to explain a significant $296 million change; and why did he not come clean on that issue in his own press release? Mr C.C. PORTER

AnswerView source ↗

I was so tricky that I have explained it publicly three or four times! It is in the budget papers. Just because it is hard for the member to find does not mean it is hidden.
Mr C.C. PORTER replied: I was so tricky that I have explained it publicly three or four times! It is in the budget papers. Just because it is hard for the member to find does not mean it is hidden.
I was so tricky that I have explained it publicly three or four times! It is in the budget papers. Just because it is hard for the member to find does not mean it is hidden.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more