❓ Hon. Norman Moore questions the government on the water extraction capacity and planned rates of bore fields, and whether a water project met its timeline. The government asserts the project was delivered on time and under budget.
AnsweredQoN 384Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(b) what is the annual water extraction capacity for each bore field; (c) what is the planned extraction rate for each bore field; and (d) why hasn’t the project met the Premier’s announced time line which was for the summer officially just gone?
(c) what is the planned extraction rate for each bore field; and (d) why hasn’t the project met the Premier’s announced time line which was for the summer officially just gone?
(d) why hasn’t the project met the Premier’s announced time line which was for the summer officially just gone?
(c) what is the planned extraction rate for each bore field; and (d) why hasn’t the project met the Premier’s announced time line which was for the summer officially just gone?
(d) why hasn’t the project met the Premier’s announced time line which was for the summer officially just gone?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
13 March 2003
Responded by
Minister for Government Enterprises
Response time
9 days
b) Licensed abstraction is 5 GL per annum per bore. c) Planned abstraction is 5 GL per year from each bore during periods of short supply but this resource will be rested when demand can be met from other groundwater and surface water sources. d) The project has been delivered on time and under budget. 2. No. The advice was contained in a Cabinet submission dated 2 April 2002.
c) Planned abstraction is 5 GL per year from each bore during periods of short supply but this resource will be rested when demand can be met from other groundwater and surface water sources. d) The project has been delivered on time and under budget. 2. No. The advice was contained in a Cabinet submission dated 2 April 2002.
d) The project has been delivered on time and under budget. 2. No. The advice was contained in a Cabinet submission dated 2 April 2002.
2. No. The advice was contained in a Cabinet submission dated 2 April 2002.
c) Planned abstraction is 5 GL per year from each bore during periods of short supply but this resource will be rested when demand can be met from other groundwater and surface water sources. d) The project has been delivered on time and under budget. 2. No. The advice was contained in a Cabinet submission dated 2 April 2002.
d) The project has been delivered on time and under budget. 2. No. The advice was contained in a Cabinet submission dated 2 April 2002.
2. No. The advice was contained in a Cabinet submission dated 2 April 2002.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.