❓ Question on Notice regarding police staffing levels in the Wheatbelt District between 2009 and 2013, including sworn officers, auxiliary officers, detectives, and forensic officers. The response provides planned and actual strengths but lacks specific details on detective and forensic roles due to resource constraints.
AnsweredQoN 1637Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to police numbers in the Wheatbelt District, and ask: (a) as at 31 October 2013, how many sworn police officers (provide by full-time equivalent (FTE) and actual head-count) were employed in this District; (b) as at 31 October for each year 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, how many sworn police officers (provide by FTE and actual head-count) were employed in this District; (c) as at 31 October 2013, how many auxiliary officers (provide by FTE and actual head-count) were employed in this District; (d) as at 31 October 2013, how many detectives (provide by FTE and actual head-count) were employed in this District; (e) as at 31 October for each year 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, how many detectives (provide by FTE and actual head-count) were employed in this District; (f) as at 31 October 2012, how many forensic officers (provide by FTE and actual head-count) were employed in this District; and (g) as at 31 October for each year 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, how many forensic officers (provide by FTE and actual head-count) were employed in this District?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
3 February 2014
Responded by
Minister for Police
Response time
60 days
(a)-(g)
The table below represents the planned and actual strengths for the Wheatbelt District as at 31 October each nominated year.
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Planned Strength
152
153
155
156
159
Actual Strength
148
150
127
147
148
Planned Auxiliary
-
-
-
-
0
Actual Auxiliary
-
-
-
-
0
Planned Detectives
5
5
5
5
7
Planned Forensic
1
1
1
1
2
The Actual Strength number includes officers on Leave Without Pay.
The reduced Actual Strength in 2011 is due to staff relocation for CHOGM.
The response required for parts of questions (d)-(g) relating to the actual officers undertaking detective and forensic roles in the districts would take a significant amount of time and resources to collate and process. It is therefore not possible for Police to obtain this information without significantly compromising other core activities.
The table below represents the planned and actual strengths for the Wheatbelt District as at 31 October each nominated year.
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Planned Strength
152
153
155
156
159
Actual Strength
148
150
127
147
148
Planned Auxiliary
-
-
-
-
0
Actual Auxiliary
-
-
-
-
0
Planned Detectives
5
5
5
5
7
Planned Forensic
1
1
1
1
2
The Actual Strength number includes officers on Leave Without Pay.
The reduced Actual Strength in 2011 is due to staff relocation for CHOGM.
The response required for parts of questions (d)-(g) relating to the actual officers undertaking detective and forensic roles in the districts would take a significant amount of time and resources to collate and process. It is therefore not possible for Police to obtain this information without significantly compromising other core activities.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.