Hon Tom Stephens asks about mineral leases and tenements near Roebuck Bay, particularly those held by Eagle Hawke Pty Ltd. Hon N.F. Moore responds that there are no granted tenements in the area, and Eagle Hawke Pty Ltd holds none.

AnsweredQoN 283Legislative Council
Asked
10 October 2000
Portfolio
Mines

QuestionView source ↗

(1) Will the minister table a map and details of any mineral lease that currently exists in reference to Roebuck Bay and the adjacent coastline? (2) Will the minister table details of any mineral tenements or mining leases that currently exist in this area for any mineral sand extraction? (3) What mining tenements, leases or exploration entitlements are currently held by the company Eagle Hawke Pty Ltd in the vicinity of Roebuck Bay? (4) When were these granted, and for what purpose? Hon N.F. MOORE

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I table the existing applications for mining tenement. (2) I table a schedule of all existing applications. There are no granted tenements in the area. (3) None. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 337.]
(2) Will the minister table details of any mineral tenements or mining leases that currently exist in this area for any mineral sand extraction? (3) What mining tenements, leases or exploration entitlements are currently held by the company Eagle Hawke Pty Ltd in the vicinity of Roebuck Bay? (4) When were these granted, and for what purpose? Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I table the existing applications for mining tenement. (2) I table a schedule of all existing applications. There are no granted tenements in the area. (3) None. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 337.]
(3) What mining tenements, leases or exploration entitlements are currently held by the company Eagle Hawke Pty Ltd in the vicinity of Roebuck Bay? (4) When were these granted, and for what purpose? Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I table the existing applications for mining tenement. (2) I table a schedule of all existing applications. There are no granted tenements in the area. (3) None. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 337.]
(4) When were these granted, and for what purpose? Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I table the existing applications for mining tenement. (2) I table a schedule of all existing applications. There are no granted tenements in the area. (3) None. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 337.]
Hon N.F. MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I table the existing applications for mining tenement. (2) I table a schedule of all existing applications. There are no granted tenements in the area. (3) None. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 337.]
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I table the existing applications for mining tenement. (2) I table a schedule of all existing applications. There are no granted tenements in the area. (3) None. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 337.]
(1) I table the existing applications for mining tenement. (2) I table a schedule of all existing applications. There are no granted tenements in the area. (3) None. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 337.]
(2) I table a schedule of all existing applications. There are no granted tenements in the area. (3) None. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 337.]
(3) None. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 337.]
(4) Not applicable. [See paper 337.]
[See paper 337.]

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more