Hon Robin Chapple questions the Premier regarding the adequacy of the response to a previous Parliamentary Question (PQ 1265), alleging the Premier avoided providing a clear and relevant answer. The Premier's response refers back to a previous Ministerial Statement.

AnsweredQoN 1386Legislative Council
Asked
24 October 2003
Portfolio
Premier

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to question on notice number 1265 of September 19 2003 and the answer provided -
(1) Given the Premier has stated ‘My government accepts the responsibility of answering Parliamentary questions’, does the Premier consider it to be fundamentally important for all his cabinet Ministers appointed to be open and accountable to the Parliament in answering all questions in a concise, relevant and free from argument manner?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
(3) If yes to (1), why?
(4) Can the Premier explain why he avoided giving a clear, concise and relevant answer to part (7) of the question?
(5) If no to (4), why not?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
2 December 2003
Responded by
Leader of the House representing the Premier
Response time
39 days
The information sought by the Member in relation to PQ 1265 was made available by way of the Premier's Brief Ministerial Statement on 9th September 2003.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more