❓ A parliamentary question seeks details on grants and subsidies provided by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure, including acquittal status. The response provides aggregated data and refers to existing accountability procedures, offering to address specific grant inquiries.
AnsweredQoN 1773Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) what was the value of each Grant; (c) for each Grant, has an acquittal of the funding been provided; (d) if not, why not; and (e) for each Grant where an acquittal has not been provided, when will the acquittal be provided?
(c) for each Grant, has an acquittal of the funding been provided; (d) if not, why not; and (e) for each Grant where an acquittal has not been provided, when will the acquittal be provided?
(d) if not, why not; and (e) for each Grant where an acquittal has not been provided, when will the acquittal be provided?
(e) for each Grant where an acquittal has not been provided, when will the acquittal be provided?
(a)-(e) There are over 28,000 line item entries, totalling $337,848,655.67 that are listed under Grants and Subsidies in the financial records of the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. These items account for all recoups, grants, subsidies, reimbursements, contributions, allowances and concessions for the complete range of departmental activities. I am not prepared to allocate scarce resources in order to provide details of individual acquittals for the Member. However, if the Member has a question concerning specific Departmental grants I would be pleased to consider it. On the general issue of acquittals, I can advise the Member that the Department has appropriate procedures in place to ensure proper accountability of public monies that are subject to examination by the Auditor General For the Western Australian Planning Commission: (a) 948 (b) $10,226,786.26 (c)-(e) See response above. Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned (a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Western Australian Planning Commission: (a) 948 (b) $10,226,786.26 (c)-(e) See response above. Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned (a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) 948 (b) $10,226,786.26 (c)-(e) See response above. Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned (a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) $10,226,786.26 (c)-(e) See response above. Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned (a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c)-(e) See response above. Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned (a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned (a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A
(c) for each Grant, has an acquittal of the funding been provided; (d) if not, why not; and (e) for each Grant where an acquittal has not been provided, when will the acquittal be provided?
(d) if not, why not; and (e) for each Grant where an acquittal has not been provided, when will the acquittal be provided?
(e) for each Grant where an acquittal has not been provided, when will the acquittal be provided?
(a)-(e) There are over 28,000 line item entries, totalling $337,848,655.67 that are listed under Grants and Subsidies in the financial records of the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. These items account for all recoups, grants, subsidies, reimbursements, contributions, allowances and concessions for the complete range of departmental activities. I am not prepared to allocate scarce resources in order to provide details of individual acquittals for the Member. However, if the Member has a question concerning specific Departmental grants I would be pleased to consider it. On the general issue of acquittals, I can advise the Member that the Department has appropriate procedures in place to ensure proper accountability of public monies that are subject to examination by the Auditor General For the Western Australian Planning Commission: (a) 948 (b) $10,226,786.26 (c)-(e) See response above. Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned (a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Western Australian Planning Commission: (a) 948 (b) $10,226,786.26 (c)-(e) See response above. Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned (a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) 948 (b) $10,226,786.26 (c)-(e) See response above. Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned (a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) $10,226,786.26 (c)-(e) See response above. Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned (a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c)-(e) See response above. Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned (a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned (a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) One grant was made by the PTA. (b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) $861,000 (c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) Yes (d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) Not applicable (e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) Not applicable For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For Main Roads (MRWA): (a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows: Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Strategic and Technical Support These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements. Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Direct Grants These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads. Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Road Project Grants These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State. Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Traffic Management & Road Safety These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads. Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Bridges As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects. State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
State Initiatives on Local Roads These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility. Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year. (b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03 Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Local Road Heading $M Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Strategic and Technical Support 1.300 Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Direct Grants 11.867 Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Road Project Grants 45.513 Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Road Safety 12.515 Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496 Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Bridges 3.292 State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784 CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257 Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Total Allocation 100.024 (c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows: Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Direct Grants To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads. All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
All Other Grants Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group. Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal. Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations. (d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised. (e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised. For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For LandCorp: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA): (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) None (d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) None (e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) None For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For Midland Redevelopment Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA): (a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) None (c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) None (d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) None (e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) None For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Albany Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Broome Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Bunbury Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Nil (b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) Nil (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) Nil (e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) Nil For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Dampier Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Esperance Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Fremantle Port Authority: (a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) None (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Geraldton Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
For the Port Headland Port Authority: (a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(a) Nil (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(c) N/A (d) N/A (e) N/A
(d) N/A (e) N/A
(e) N/A
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
30 October 2003
Responded by
Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
79 days
For the Department for Planning and Infrastructure:
(a)-(e) There are over 28,000 line item entries, totalling $337,848,655.67 that are listed under Grants and Subsidies in the financial records of the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. These items account for all recoups, grants, subsidies, reimbursements, contributions, allowances and concessions for the complete range of departmental activities. I am not prepared to allocate scarce resources in order to provide details of individual acquittals for the Member. However, if the Member has a question concerning specific Departmental grants I would be pleased to consider it. On the general issue of acquittals, I can advise the Member that the Department has appropriate procedures in place to ensure proper accountability of public monies that are subject to examination by the Auditor General
For the Western Australian Planning Commission:
(a) 948
(b) $10,226,786.26
(c)-(e) See response above.
Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned
(a) One grant was made by the PTA.
(b) $861,000
(c) Yes
(d) Not applicable
(e) Not applicable
For Main Roads (MRWA):
(a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows:
Strategic and Technical Support
These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements.
Direct Grants
These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads.
Road Project Grants
These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State.
Traffic Management & Road Safety
These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads.
Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities
Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects.
Bridges
As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects.
State Initiatives on Local Roads
These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility.
Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park
These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year.
(b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03
Local Road Heading $M
Strategic and Technical Support 1.300
Direct Grants 11.867
Road Project Grants 45.513
Road Safety 12.515
Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496
Bridges 3.292
State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784
CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257
Total Allocation 100.024
(c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows:
Direct Grants
To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads.
All Other Grants
Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group.
Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal.
Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations.
(d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised.
(e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised.
For LandCorp:
(a) None
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA):
(a) Nil
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA):
(a) None
(b) None
(c) None
(d) None
(e) None
For Midland Redevelopment Authority:
(a) Nil
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA):
(a) None
(b) None
(c) None
(d) None
(e) None
For the Albany Port Authority:
(a) None
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For the Broome Port Authority:
(a) None
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For the Bunbury Port Authority:
(a) Nil
(b) Nil
(c) Nil
(d) Nil
(e) Nil
For the Dampier Port Authority:
(a) None
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For the Esperance Port Authority:
(a) Nil
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For the Fremantle Port Authority:
(a) None
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For the Geraldton Port Authority:
(a) Nil
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For the Port Headland Port Authority:
(a) Nil
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
(a)-(e) There are over 28,000 line item entries, totalling $337,848,655.67 that are listed under Grants and Subsidies in the financial records of the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. These items account for all recoups, grants, subsidies, reimbursements, contributions, allowances and concessions for the complete range of departmental activities. I am not prepared to allocate scarce resources in order to provide details of individual acquittals for the Member. However, if the Member has a question concerning specific Departmental grants I would be pleased to consider it. On the general issue of acquittals, I can advise the Member that the Department has appropriate procedures in place to ensure proper accountability of public monies that are subject to examination by the Auditor General
For the Western Australian Planning Commission:
(a) 948
(b) $10,226,786.26
(c)-(e) See response above.
Insofar as the Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned
(a) One grant was made by the PTA.
(b) $861,000
(c) Yes
(d) Not applicable
(e) Not applicable
For Main Roads (MRWA):
(a) Assuming the definitions of grants used in the preparation of submissions under the State Budget Papers Process, then a total of $100,024,000 was allocated in the 2002/03 Budget under the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. This agreement provides for State Road Funds to be allocated under eight categories for road projects/works on the local roads networks in the one hundred and forty two Local Governments in this State, as well as local roads controlled by Conservation and Land Management and the Kings Park and Rottnest Island Boards. The eight categories are as follows:
Strategic and Technical Support
These funds are for administrative and technical support provided by Main Roads to Regional Road Groups (RRGs), Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) operations and other support requirements.
Direct Grants
These funds are distributed to Councils for road preservation and capital works at their discretion. They are distributed using the Asset Preservation Model as determined by the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission. For a Local Government to qualify for their Direct Grant allocation they must provide a certified statement that demonstrates their previous year’s Grant was spent on roads.
Road Project Grants
These funds are provided for specific projects for road improvements, the provision of new roads where required and for preservation works such as reseals to maintain the asset. Regional Road Groups consider submissions from Shires within their Region and prioritise these projects using a multi criteria analysis type approach. Each Regional Road Group then makes recommendations for the State Road Funds to Local Government Advisory Committee’s consideration for inclusion in the Local Roads Annual Program. In general, Road Project Grants require a $1 matching contribution from the Local Government for every $2 provided by the State.
Traffic Management & Road Safety
These funds are provided for the installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings, traffic control signals, channelisation, railway crossing maintenance and road safety initiatives on Local Roads.
Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities
Portion of the annual Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants for Local Roads is set aside by the West Australian Local Government Grants Commission for expenditure on special projects, of which one third is applied to roads serving aboriginal communities. These funds are supplemented by a matching contribution of $1 from the State for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects.
Bridges
As per the arrangement described for access roads to aboriginal communities, the other two thirds of the portion of Commonwealth grants set aside for special projects is applied to the improvement, maintenance and periodic inspection of bridges on Local Roads. The State provides a matching contribution of $1 for every $2 provided under the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. The State also provides additional funds towards the Program above it’s matching contribution for specific projects.
State Initiatives on Local Roads
These funds are provided in support of State Initiatives affecting Local Government roads. Generally these projects are seen as having significant benefit to the State that is greater than the benefits, which are also returned to the local community. These projects may be of strategic or developmental benefit even though they do not meet the minimum criteria to be classified as a State Road responsibility.
Conservation and Land Management, Rottnest Island, Kings Park
These funds are for the development and maintenance of roads in National Parks and State Forests, Rottnest Island and Kings Park. $2 million is provided directly to Conservation and Land Management for a specific annual Program with outcomes reported back to Main Roads at the end of each year.
(b) Value of each grant category in 2002/03
Local Road Heading $M
Strategic and Technical Support 1.300
Direct Grants 11.867
Road Project Grants 45.513
Road Safety 12.515
Access Roads to Aboriginal Communities 3.496
Bridges 3.292
State Initiatives on Local Roads 19.784
CALM, Rottnest Island and Kings Park 2.257
Total Allocation 100.024
(c) The acquittal processes for these grants are as follows:
Direct Grants
To qualify for these allocations Councils and Conservation and Land Management must provide a certificate of completion stating that the previous year’s allocation has been spent on local roads.
All Other Grants
Councils may claim payment for the full programmed amount following completion of the project and certification of the satisfactory project completion to the Regional Road Group.
Councils may elect to apply to Main Roads for an advance payment equal to 40% of project estimates. A further 40% may be paid on certification that actual expenditure on the project has exceeded 40% of the project estimate. The balance will be paid on certification of satisfactory project completion of the work in accordance with the project proposal.
Not all acquittals have been completed at this stage for 2002/03 allocations.
(d) Acquittals have not been provided because projects are still in progress and/or financial details are yet to be finalised.
(e) The acquittal will be provided when the works are completed and the financial detail finalised.
For LandCorp:
(a) None
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For Armadale Redevelopment Authority (ARA):
(a) Nil
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA):
(a) None
(b) None
(c) None
(d) None
(e) None
For Midland Redevelopment Authority:
(a) Nil
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA):
(a) None
(b) None
(c) None
(d) None
(e) None
For the Albany Port Authority:
(a) None
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For the Broome Port Authority:
(a) None
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For the Bunbury Port Authority:
(a) Nil
(b) Nil
(c) Nil
(d) Nil
(e) Nil
For the Dampier Port Authority:
(a) None
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For the Esperance Port Authority:
(a) Nil
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For the Fremantle Port Authority:
(a) None
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For the Geraldton Port Authority:
(a) Nil
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
For the Port Headland Port Authority:
(a) Nil
(b) N/A
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(e) N/A
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.