Hon. M.J. Criddle questions the necessity of a survey conducted by 18 drought-affected shires, suggesting the Department of Agriculture should already possess the relevant information. Hon. Kim Chance responds, indicating the department could have provided some of the requested data.

AnsweredQoN 405Legislative Council
Asked
9 August 2001
Portfolio
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

QuestionView source ↗

As the minister knows, the 18 shires in the south eastern wheatbelt, which is affected by drought, have found it necessary to conduct a survey.  Why is that duplication necessary given that the Department of Agriculture should, by the minister’s insistence, have the information? Hon KIM CHANCE

AnswerView source ↗

It is an interesting question.  I cannot say that I understand exactly what was asked by the 18 shires and whether the information sought by them would normally be available to the Department of Agriculture.  To the extent I have any understanding of the data sought by the shires, much of it is related to non-farming businesses.  Perhaps that is the reason for the survey. Hon M.J. Criddle:  Local people were asked about their financial situation so that the shires could get a handle on the problems in those areas. Hon KIM CHANCE:  Had the shires approached the department for that data, it would have been made available to them.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: It is an interesting question.  I cannot say that I understand exactly what was asked by the 18 shires and whether the information sought by them would normally be available to the Department of Agriculture.  To the extent I have any understanding of the data sought by the shires, much of it is related to non-farming businesses.  Perhaps that is the reason for the survey. Hon M.J. Criddle:  Local people were asked about their financial situation so that the shires could get a handle on the problems in those areas. Hon KIM CHANCE:  Had the shires approached the department for that data, it would have been made available to them.
It is an interesting question.  I cannot say that I understand exactly what was asked by the 18 shires and whether the information sought by them would normally be available to the Department of Agriculture.  To the extent I have any understanding of the data sought by the shires, much of it is related to non-farming businesses.  Perhaps that is the reason for the survey. Hon M.J. Criddle:  Local people were asked about their financial situation so that the shires could get a handle on the problems in those areas. Hon KIM CHANCE:  Had the shires approached the department for that data, it would have been made available to them.
Hon M.J. Criddle:  Local people were asked about their financial situation so that the shires could get a handle on the problems in those areas. Hon KIM CHANCE:  Had the shires approached the department for that data, it would have been made available to them.
Hon KIM CHANCE:  Had the shires approached the department for that data, it would have been made available to them.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more