❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding the number of vehicles in the fleet of various Departments, Agencies, and Government-owned corporations under the Minister for Regional Development's responsibility, and any reductions made in 2009-10. The answers show varying fleet sizes and reduction targets across different entities.
AnsweredQoN 2094Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
For each Department, Agency or Government owned corporation for which the Minister has responsibility -
(1) How many vehicles did each of the abovementioned have in their fleet as at April 2009?
(2) By how many vehicles has this been reduced by?
(3) What was the target for reduction of vehicles in 2009-10?
(4) Has this target been reached?
(5) If no to (4), why not?
(1) How many vehicles did each of the abovementioned have in their fleet as at April 2009?
(2) By how many vehicles has this been reduced by?
(3) What was the target for reduction of vehicles in 2009-10?
(4) Has this target been reached?
(5) If no to (4), why not?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
4 May 2010
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development
Response time
42 days
Gascoyne Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009: 5
19 March 2010: 5
(2) Nil
(3) Nil
(4) Not applicable
(5) Not applicable
Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009: 2
19 March 2010: 2
(2) Nil
(3) Nil - no reduction required
(4) Not applicable
(5) Not applicable
Kimberley Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009: 5
19 March 2010: 5
(3) The target for reduction of vehicles in 2009-10 was to reduce vehicle numbers subject to minimum operational requirements.
(4) Yes
(5) Not applicable
Landcorp
(1) 30 April 2009: 33
19 March 2010: 33
(2) New arrangements have effectively reduced the fleet by two vehicles. As LandCorp's scope of operations has grown, without the new arrangements, fleet numbers would total 35 but have been maintained at 33.
(3) 10%
(4) Effectively yes if the growth is included (from 33 to 35). LandCorp will also be returning two vehicles in April 2010, when leases expire, reducing the fleet to 31.
(5) Not applicable
Landgate
(1) 30 April 2009: 74
19 March 2010: 71
(2) Three
(3) Three
(4) Yes
(5) Not Applicable
Mid West Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009: 3
19 March 2010: 4 (Bought new vehicle and in the process of disposing of old one)
(2) Nil
(3) Nil
(4) Yes
(5) Not applicable
Peel Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009: 6
19 March: 6
(2) Nil
(3) Nil (target reduction of vehicles is 2011/12)
(4) Yes
(5) Not applicable
Department of Regional Development and Lands
(1) 30 April 2009: Not applicable
19 March 2010: 27
(2) Not applicable
(3) Not applicable
(4) Not applicable
(5) Not applicable
South West Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009: 12
19 March 2010: 12
(2) - (3) Nil
(4) Yes
(5) Not applicable
Pilbara Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009:5
19 March 2010: 4
2) 1
3) 1
4) Yes
(5) Not applicable
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(1) 30 April 2009: 5
19 March 2010: 5
(2) Nil
(3) Nil
(4) Not applicable
(5) Not applicable
Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009: 2
19 March 2010: 2
(2) Nil
(3) Nil - no reduction required
(4) Not applicable
(5) Not applicable
Kimberley Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009: 5
19 March 2010: 5
(3) The target for reduction of vehicles in 2009-10 was to reduce vehicle numbers subject to minimum operational requirements.
(4) Yes
(5) Not applicable
Landcorp
(1) 30 April 2009: 33
19 March 2010: 33
(2) New arrangements have effectively reduced the fleet by two vehicles. As LandCorp's scope of operations has grown, without the new arrangements, fleet numbers would total 35 but have been maintained at 33.
(3) 10%
(4) Effectively yes if the growth is included (from 33 to 35). LandCorp will also be returning two vehicles in April 2010, when leases expire, reducing the fleet to 31.
(5) Not applicable
Landgate
(1) 30 April 2009: 74
19 March 2010: 71
(2) Three
(3) Three
(4) Yes
(5) Not Applicable
Mid West Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009: 3
19 March 2010: 4 (Bought new vehicle and in the process of disposing of old one)
(2) Nil
(3) Nil
(4) Yes
(5) Not applicable
Peel Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009: 6
19 March: 6
(2) Nil
(3) Nil (target reduction of vehicles is 2011/12)
(4) Yes
(5) Not applicable
Department of Regional Development and Lands
(1) 30 April 2009: Not applicable
19 March 2010: 27
(2) Not applicable
(3) Not applicable
(4) Not applicable
(5) Not applicable
South West Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009: 12
19 March 2010: 12
(2) - (3) Nil
(4) Yes
(5) Not applicable
Pilbara Development Commission
(1) 30 April 2009:5
19 March 2010: 4
2) 1
3) 1
4) Yes
(5) Not applicable
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.