❓ Question regarding proposed freehold title grant on the Burrup Peninsula to Aboriginal groups, raising concerns about existing land use plans, conservation, public access, and seeking transparency. The Minister's answer focuses on the economic benefits of industrial development, the need to address native title claims, and criticises the previous government's inaction.
AnsweredQoN 1041Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
I refer the Deputy Premier, in his role as the minister responsible for native title, to reports that he proposes awarding freehold title over almost the entire northern half of the Burrup Peninsula to three Aboriginal groups, and ask - (1) Is the Deputy Premier aware of the Burrup Peninsula land use plan and management strategy that was developed over a three-year period in consultation with Aboriginal groups, industry, local government and local interest groups? (2) Is the Deputy Premier aware of a key recommendation of this report, which was later endorsed by Cabinet, for nearly two-thirds of the peninsula, including the entire northern part of the peninsula, to be preserved for conservation and recreation purposes? (3) Will the Deputy Premier assure the House that, while still preserving the role and culture of local Aboriginal groups, the Burrup Peninsula will remain accessible to all Western Australians and freehold title will not be granted to any one group? (4) Will the Deputy Premier table the state alternative agreement proposal dated 6 February 2002? Mr RIPPER
AnswerView source ↗
(1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
(1) Is the Deputy Premier aware of the Burrup Peninsula land use plan and management strategy that was developed over a three-year period in consultation with Aboriginal groups, industry, local government and local interest groups? (2) Is the Deputy Premier aware of a key recommendation of this report, which was later endorsed by Cabinet, for nearly two-thirds of the peninsula, including the entire northern part of the peninsula, to be preserved for conservation and recreation purposes? (3) Will the Deputy Premier assure the House that, while still preserving the role and culture of local Aboriginal groups, the Burrup Peninsula will remain accessible to all Western Australians and freehold title will not be granted to any one group? (4) Will the Deputy Premier table the state alternative agreement proposal dated 6 February 2002? Mr RIPPER replied: (1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
(2) Is the Deputy Premier aware of a key recommendation of this report, which was later endorsed by Cabinet, for nearly two-thirds of the peninsula, including the entire northern part of the peninsula, to be preserved for conservation and recreation purposes? (3) Will the Deputy Premier assure the House that, while still preserving the role and culture of local Aboriginal groups, the Burrup Peninsula will remain accessible to all Western Australians and freehold title will not be granted to any one group? (4) Will the Deputy Premier table the state alternative agreement proposal dated 6 February 2002? Mr RIPPER replied: (1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
(3) Will the Deputy Premier assure the House that, while still preserving the role and culture of local Aboriginal groups, the Burrup Peninsula will remain accessible to all Western Australians and freehold title will not be granted to any one group? (4) Will the Deputy Premier table the state alternative agreement proposal dated 6 February 2002? Mr RIPPER replied: (1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
(4) Will the Deputy Premier table the state alternative agreement proposal dated 6 February 2002? Mr RIPPER replied: (1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Mr RIPPER replied: (1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
(1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
(1) Is the Deputy Premier aware of the Burrup Peninsula land use plan and management strategy that was developed over a three-year period in consultation with Aboriginal groups, industry, local government and local interest groups? (2) Is the Deputy Premier aware of a key recommendation of this report, which was later endorsed by Cabinet, for nearly two-thirds of the peninsula, including the entire northern part of the peninsula, to be preserved for conservation and recreation purposes? (3) Will the Deputy Premier assure the House that, while still preserving the role and culture of local Aboriginal groups, the Burrup Peninsula will remain accessible to all Western Australians and freehold title will not be granted to any one group? (4) Will the Deputy Premier table the state alternative agreement proposal dated 6 February 2002? Mr RIPPER replied: (1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
(2) Is the Deputy Premier aware of a key recommendation of this report, which was later endorsed by Cabinet, for nearly two-thirds of the peninsula, including the entire northern part of the peninsula, to be preserved for conservation and recreation purposes? (3) Will the Deputy Premier assure the House that, while still preserving the role and culture of local Aboriginal groups, the Burrup Peninsula will remain accessible to all Western Australians and freehold title will not be granted to any one group? (4) Will the Deputy Premier table the state alternative agreement proposal dated 6 February 2002? Mr RIPPER replied: (1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
(3) Will the Deputy Premier assure the House that, while still preserving the role and culture of local Aboriginal groups, the Burrup Peninsula will remain accessible to all Western Australians and freehold title will not be granted to any one group? (4) Will the Deputy Premier table the state alternative agreement proposal dated 6 February 2002? Mr RIPPER replied: (1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
(4) Will the Deputy Premier table the state alternative agreement proposal dated 6 February 2002? Mr RIPPER replied: (1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Mr RIPPER replied: (1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
(1)-(4) We have the possibility of $6 billion worth of investment occurring on the Burrup Peninsula. That is a very big prize for the State’s economy. The project proponents have strict deadlines under which they want access to the land, otherwise there is a possibility that the projects could go to other places in the world. These native title claims have been on foot for quite some time; they were lodged in 1994 and 1995. Had the planning referred to by the Leader of the Opposition really been done, surely some attempt would have been made to negotiate acquisition of the native title rights on this industrial land some time following the submission of those claims in 1994 and 1995; but, no, that work was not done. The projects have now arrived and we have a very tight time line within which to complete the negotiations. We are engaging in a legal process and we are following the processes outlined in the federal Native Title Act and we are doing so under the supervision and guidance of the National Native Title Tribunal. The national tribunal member who is mediating on this issue has asked for the negotiations to be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. That requirement has been put forward. Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Mr Birney interjected. Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Mr RIPPER: The member should calm down; there is no need to scaremonger; there is no need to fan any division within the community. If the member is patient and listens to me, he will see that we have taken care of some of the issues he is concerned about. The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
The Leader of the Opposition referred to a structure plan for the Burrup. Yes, I am aware of that document; it is an important document and it forms part of the basis for our negotiations. Very important areas on the Burrup need to be protected. These areas are rich in indigenous heritage and have sensitive conservation values. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
The SPEAKER: Members! Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Mr RIPPER: Mr Speaker, I am sure you would like me to explain this matter calmly and in some detail. What is proposed is a form of title over that part of the Burrup, which will allow for these indigenous and conservation interests and for the protection of the important rock art and conservation values; and which will provide for co-management of the area by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and the indigenous parties, and for public access. We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
We are trying to do something important. On the one hand, we are trying to get $6 billion worth of projects up and running and, on the other hand, we are trying to respectfully and lawfully deal with the interests of the native title parties, all of whom have registered claims before the Federal Court. We are also trying to protect the indigenous heritage and the conservation values. At the same time, we are trying to provide the residents of Karratha with access to the recreational land that they need. All these factors have been taken into account in a complex set of negotiations, involving three different native title groups and six proponents, as well as tight deadlines. This is not an easy set of negotiations to conclude. If the Leader of the Opposition thinks that all the work was done by the coalition when it was in power, he is wrong. The negotiations that should have taken place with those native title parties did not occur. We now have the projects, the deadlines are approaching, and we must quickly complete the negotiations. If the coalition were genuinely planning for the proper industrial development of the Burrup, those negotiations should have taken place soon after the native title claims were submitted in 1994-95. This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
This is a magnificent opportunity for Western Australia, a magnificent opportunity for downstream processing and a magnificent opportunity for billions of dollars worth of investment. If we can do it properly, lawfully and respectfully, recognising traditional owners’ rights, we can obtain the investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to allow for the proper protection of those conservation and indigenous heritage areas. Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Mr Birney interjected. The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
The SPEAKER: The member for Kalgoorlie! Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Mr RIPPER: The member for Kalgoorlie probably does not share this hope, but I hope that as well as getting the downstream processing projects, we will provide an opportunity for indigenous people to run tourism ventures, for example, taking foreign tourists to those areas of indigenous heritage that they are so keen to see.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.