❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks data on move-on notices issued under the Criminal Investigation Act, focusing on their impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and the severity of penalties for breaches.
AnsweredQoN 1058Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION ACT - MOVE-ON NOTICES
It has now been a little longer than one year since the Standing Committee on Legislation issued its report on the Criminal Investigation Bill 2005, the Criminal Investigation (Consequential Provisions) Bill 2005 and the Criminal and Found Property Disposal Bill 2005. One of the issues considered by the committee was the impact on the community, and particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, of move-on notices, which are now made pursuant to section 27 of the Criminal Investigation Act 2006. (1) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued to people who are Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders? (2) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (3) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued to people who are not Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders? (4) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (5) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued for a period longer than 20 hours? (6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH
It has now been a little longer than one year since the Standing Committee on Legislation issued its report on the Criminal Investigation Bill 2005, the Criminal Investigation (Consequential Provisions) Bill 2005 and the Criminal and Found Property Disposal Bill 2005. One of the issues considered by the committee was the impact on the community, and particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, of move-on notices, which are now made pursuant to section 27 of the Criminal Investigation Act 2006. (1) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued to people who are Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders? (2) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (3) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued to people who are not Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders? (4) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (5) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued for a period longer than 20 hours? (6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(1) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued to people who are Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders? (2) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (3) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued to people who are not Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders? (4) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (5) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued for a period longer than 20 hours? (6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(2) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (3) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued to people who are not Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders? (4) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (5) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued for a period longer than 20 hours? (6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(3) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued to people who are not Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders? (4) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (5) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued for a period longer than 20 hours? (6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(4) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (5) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued for a period longer than 20 hours? (6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(5) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued for a period longer than 20 hours? (6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
[See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(1) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued to people who are Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders? (2) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (3) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued to people who are not Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders? (4) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (5) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued for a period longer than 20 hours? (6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(2) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (3) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued to people who are not Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders? (4) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (5) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued for a period longer than 20 hours? (6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(3) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued to people who are not Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders? (4) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (5) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued for a period longer than 20 hours? (6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(4) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (5) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued for a period longer than 20 hours? (6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(5) Over the past six months, how many move-on notices have been issued for a period longer than 20 hours? (6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(6) Of these, how many have been charged with breaches of the notice? (7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(7) Over the past six months, of the people charged with breaches of move-on notices, how many of these people were exposed to a potential penalty that was higher than that for the suspected conduct for which the move-on notice was issued? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
I thank the honourable member for the question. On behalf of the Minister for Regional Development, I am happy to provide the response. However, in view of the fact that it is a fairly lengthy response, I ask that it be tabled and leave granted for it to be incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
Leave granted. [See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
[See paper 3477.] The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
The following material was incorporated - I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
I thank the Hon. Member for some notice of this question. For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
For the period 1-May 2007 to 31-October 2007 inclusive: 5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
5,380 Move on notices were issued 2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
2,721 (50.6%) Move on notices had no ethnicity recorded 2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
2,659 (49.4%) Move on notices had ethnicity recorded 503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
503 charges were prepared by WA Police for breaching move on notices 493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
493 (98.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded 10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
10 (2.0%) charges have ethnicity recorded as unknown (1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(1) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,467 (55.2%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(2) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity was recorded, 207 (42.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(3) Of the 2,659 move on notices issued where ethnicity was recorded, 1,192 (44.8%) were issued to persons with a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. (4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(4) Of the 493 charges resulting from breach of notice where ethnicity is recorded, 286 (58.0%) had a recorded ethnicity of non Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (See Notes). (5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(5) Of the 5,380 Move on notices issued, 1,724 (32.0%) were issued for a period longer than 20 hours. (6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(6) Charges resulting from breach of notice are unable to be linked to individual move on notices (See notes), and consequently charges for breach of a move on notice issued for a period longer than 20 hours cannot be provided. (7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(7) Specific offence data regarding the nature of the incident likely to occur, being committed or intended to commit, for which the move on notice has been issued is not recorded within the source systems and cannot be reported. As the penalties for the offence cannot be determined this question cannot be answered. Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
Notes: (a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(a) These statistics are correct as at 14/11/2007. Statistics may change due to the data extraction process, which updates data for a period of 13 months to include all new or updated records in the source system. (b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(b) The FrontLine Incident Management System (IMS) records Ethnicity which is completed on the basis of how a person describes their ethnicity/race. (c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(c) Aboriginality/Indigenous Status is derived from the ‘Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander?’ field in the Western Australia Police BriefCase system. The offender is asked a standard question developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. (d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
(d) Source systems do not contain a link between Persons charged with breaching a move on notice and the specific notice against which the offence occurred.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.