❓ Hon Peter Collier asks the Minister for Child Protection about the outcomes for applicants who received negative Working with Children Checks, specifically regarding subsequent charges or classifications as dangerous sex offenders. The Minister provides some data but cites confidentiality laws as a barrier to providing all requested information.
AnsweredQoN 1372Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
WORKING WITH CHILDREN CHECKS — AUDITOR
GENERAL'S REPORT
1372. Hon PETER COLLIER to the Leader of the House
representing the Minister for Child Protection:
I refer to the Auditor General's report titled ''Working
with Children Check—Follow-up''.
(1) Of the 19 applicants issued with a negative interim
notice, how many were —
(a) charged with or found guilty
of a child sex offence; and
(b) classified as a dangerous sex
offender?
(2) Of the 21
applicants issued with a negative notice within 200 days, how many were —
(a) charged with or found guilty
of a child sex offence;
(b) classified
as a dangerous sex offender; and
(c) for each
applicant in (a) and (b), how long were they working with children?
(3) Of the
seven applicants issued with a negative notice after 200 days, how many were —
(a) charged with or found guilty
of a child sex offence;
(b) classified
as a dangerous sex offender; and
(c) for each
applicant in (a) and (b), how long were they working with children?
GENERAL'S REPORT
1372. Hon PETER COLLIER to the Leader of the House
representing the Minister for Child Protection:
I refer to the Auditor General's report titled ''Working
with Children Check—Follow-up''.
(1) Of the 19 applicants issued with a negative interim
notice, how many were —
(a) charged with or found guilty
of a child sex offence; and
(b) classified as a dangerous sex
offender?
(2) Of the 21
applicants issued with a negative notice within 200 days, how many were —
(a) charged with or found guilty
of a child sex offence;
(b) classified
as a dangerous sex offender; and
(c) for each
applicant in (a) and (b), how long were they working with children?
(3) Of the
seven applicants issued with a negative notice after 200 days, how many were —
(a) charged with or found guilty
of a child sex offence;
(b) classified
as a dangerous sex offender; and
(c) for each
applicant in (a) and (b), how long were they working with children?
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for some notice of the
question.
(1) (a) There were 15.
(b) The
Department of Communities does not have this information. Confidentiality
provisions of the Community Protection (Offender Reporting) Act 2004 apply to
this type of information.
(2) (a) There were 14.
(b) The
Department of Communities does not have this information. Confidentiality
provisions of the Community Protection (Offender Reporting) Act 2004 apply to
this type of information.
(c) The role
of the Department of Communities working with children screening unit is to
receive a person's application for a working with children check and
assess any risk they may pose to children if
they were to engage in child-related work. The Working with Children (Criminal
Record Checking) Act 2004 allows for people to engage in child-related
work if they have a pending application or a current working with children
card, unless they have been issued with a negative notice. It is not the role
of the working with children screening unit to track how many days a person
works on a pending application.
(3) (a) There was one.
(b) The
Department of Communities does not have this information. Confidentiality
provisions of the Community Protection (Offender Reporting) Act 2004 apply to
this type of information.
(c) The role
of the Department of Communities working with children screening unit is to
receive a person's application for a working with children check and
assess any risk they may pose to children if
they were to engage in child-related work. The Working with Children (Criminal
Record Checking) Act 2004 allows for people to engage in child-related
work if they have a pending application or a current working with children
card, unless they have been issued with a negative notice. It is not the role
of the working with children screening unit to track how many days a person
works on a pending application.
question.
(1) (a) There were 15.
(b) The
Department of Communities does not have this information. Confidentiality
provisions of the Community Protection (Offender Reporting) Act 2004 apply to
this type of information.
(2) (a) There were 14.
(b) The
Department of Communities does not have this information. Confidentiality
provisions of the Community Protection (Offender Reporting) Act 2004 apply to
this type of information.
(c) The role
of the Department of Communities working with children screening unit is to
receive a person's application for a working with children check and
assess any risk they may pose to children if
they were to engage in child-related work. The Working with Children (Criminal
Record Checking) Act 2004 allows for people to engage in child-related
work if they have a pending application or a current working with children
card, unless they have been issued with a negative notice. It is not the role
of the working with children screening unit to track how many days a person
works on a pending application.
(3) (a) There was one.
(b) The
Department of Communities does not have this information. Confidentiality
provisions of the Community Protection (Offender Reporting) Act 2004 apply to
this type of information.
(c) The role
of the Department of Communities working with children screening unit is to
receive a person's application for a working with children check and
assess any risk they may pose to children if
they were to engage in child-related work. The Working with Children (Criminal
Record Checking) Act 2004 allows for people to engage in child-related
work if they have a pending application or a current working with children
card, unless they have been issued with a negative notice. It is not the role
of the working with children screening unit to track how many days a person
works on a pending application.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.