Question regarding compliance with Priority Start–Building policy in the Hale House refurbishment contract, specifically concerning contractor registration, training plan submission, labour value, required apprentices, and actual apprentice numbers. The Minister's response indicates compliance and exceeds apprentice requirements.

AnsweredQoN 68Legislative Council
Asked
20 March 2012
Portfolio
Training and Workforce Development

QuestionView source ↗

HALE HOUSE — REFURBISHMENT CONTRACT
68. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH to the Minister for Training and
Workforce Development:
I refer to the contract for the refurbishment of Hale House.
(1) Was the
contractor registered prior to the contract being awarded as required under
component A of the Priority Start–Building policy?
(2) Did the
contractor submit the training plan form within four weeks of the contract
being awarded as required under component B?
(3) What is the value of the labour component of this
contract?
(4) How many apprentices should be employed under this
contract to meet policy requirements?
(5) What is the actual number of apprentices employed under
this contract?

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the honourable member for some notice of the
question.
(1) Yes.
(2) Yes. The
contractor submitted the training plan form to the Department of Finance's
industry training unit within four weeks of the contract being awarded.
(3) It is $5.4 million.
(4) Six.
(5) The training plan shows that nine apprentices are working
on this project.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more